A computational model for conversation policies for agent communication

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3487 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 178-195

  Bentahar, Jamal ^a   Moulin, Bernard ^a   Meyer, John Jules Ch ^b   Chaib draa, Brahim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GAME THEORY; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SET THEORY; SPECIFICATIONS;

AGENT COMMUNICATION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LOGICAL PROGRAMMING;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844501786     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11533092_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., and Parsons, S. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Multi Agent Systems (2000) 31-38.
2. Amgoud, L., and Maudet, N. Strategical considerations for argumentative agents. In Proc. of 10th Int. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (2002) 409-417.
3. th Int. Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (2004) 82-97.
4. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., and Chaib-draa, B. Commitment and argument network: a new formalism for agent communication. In [13] (2004) 146-165.
5. rd Int. J. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems AAMAS (2004) 792-799.
6. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., and Chaib-draa, B. Specifying and implementing a persuasion dialogue game using commitment and argument network. In I. Rahwan, P. Moraitis and C. Reed (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, LNAI 3366, Springer, (2005). (in press).
7. Brewka, G. Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation, 11(2) (2001) 257-282.
8. Castelfranchi, C. Commitments: from individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Multi Agent Systems (1995) 41-48.
9. Chaib-draa, B., and Dignum, F. Trends in agent communication languages. In Computational Intelligence, (18)2 (2002) 89-101.
10. Cleaveland, R. Tableau-based model checking in the prepositional mu-calculus. In Acta Informatica, 27(8) (1990) 725-747.
11. Colombetti, M. A commitment-based approach to agent speech acts and conversations. In Proc. of Int. Autonomous Agent Workshop on Conversational Policies (2000) 21-29.
12. Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., and der Torre, L.V. Negotiation protocols and dialogue games. In Proc. of Belgium/Dutch AI Conference (2000) 13-20.
13. Dignum, F. (Ed.). Advances in Agent Communication. Int. Workshop on Agent Communication Languages. LNAI 2922, Springer, (2004).
14. Dignum, F., and Greaves, M. (Eds.). Issues in agent communication. LNAI 1916, Springer (2000).
15. th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1993) 114-121.
16. Endriss, U., Maudet, N., Sadri, F., and Toni, F. Logic_based agent communication protocols. In [13] (2004) 91-107.
17. Fornara, N. and Colombetti, M. Protocol specification using a commitment based ACL. In [13] (2004) 108-127.
18. Greaves, M., Holmback, H., and Bradshaw, J. What is a conversation policy? In [14] (2000) 118-131.
19. Herrestad, H. and Krogh, C. Obligations directed from bearers to counterparties. In Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law (1995) 210-218.
20. Maudet, N., and Chaib-draa, B. Commitment-based and dialogue-game based protocols, new trends in agent communication languages. In Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2), Cambridge University Press (2002) 157-179.
21. McBurney, P., and Parsons, S. Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. In Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 11(3) (2002) 1-22.
22. nd Int. J. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2003) 616-623.
23. Prakken, H. Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. In Synthese (127) (2001) 187-219.
24. Singh, M.P. A social semantics for agent communication language. In [14] (2000) 31-45.
25. The Agent Oriented Software Group. Jack 4.1. 2004. www.agent-software. com/
26. th Int. Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (2004) 196-211.
27. Walton, D.N., and Krabbe, E.C.W. Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, NY (1995).
28. Yolum, P. and Singh, M.P. Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. In Proc. of 1st Int. J. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2002) 527-534.