Soil electrical conductivity as a covariate to improve the efficiency of field experiments

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1353-1357

  Kravchenko, A N ^a   Harrigan, T M ^b   Bailey, B B ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aeration tillage; Experimental design; Manure; Soil electrical conductivity; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MOISTURE; STATISTICAL METHODS; TEXTURES;

AERATION TILLAGE; FIELD TRIALS; SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; SOIL PROPERTIES;

SOILS;

AERATION; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MANURE; SOIL PROPERTY;

EID: 26844500742     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Auerswald, K., S. Simon, and H. Stanjek. 2001. Influence of soil properties on electrical conductivity under humid water regimes. Soil Sci. 166(6): 382-390.
2. Banton, O., M. K. Seguin, and M. A. Cimon. 1997. Mapping field-scale physical properties of soil with electrical resistivity. SSSA J. 61(4): 1010-1017.
3. Clay, D. E., J. Chang, D. D. Malo, C. G. Carlson, C. Reese, S. A. Clay, M. Ellsbury, and B. Berg. 2001. Factors influencing spatial variability of soil apparent electrical conductivity. Commun. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 32(19-20): 2993-3008.
4. Frank, K., D. Beegle, and J. Denning. 1998. Phosphorus. In Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, 21-26. J. R. Brown, ed. North Central Regional Publication No. 221 (revised). Columbia, Mo.: Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station.
5. Heiniger, R. W., R. G. McBride, and D. E. Clay. 2003. Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Agron. J. 95: 508-519.
6. Kitchen, N. R., K. A. Sudduth, and S. T. Drummond. 1999. Soil electrical conductivity as a crop productivity measure for claypan soils. J. Prod. Agric. 12(4): 607-617.
7. Lesch, S. M., D. J. Strauss, and J. D. Rhoades. 1995a. Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques, 1, Statistical prediction models: A comparison of multiple linear regression and cokriging. Water Resour. Res. 31(2): 373-386.
8. Lesch, S. M., D. J. Strauss, and J. D. Rhoades. 1995b. Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques, 2, An efficient spatial sampling algorithm suitable for multiple linear regression model identification and estimation. Water Resour. Res. 31(2): 387-398.
9. Milliken, G. A., and D. E. Johnson. 2002. Analysis of Messy Data: Analysis of Covariance. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
10. Mueller, T. G., N. J. Hartsock, T. S. Stombaugh, S. A. Shearer, P. L. Cornelius, and R. I. Barnhisel. 2003. Soil electrical conductivity map variability in limestone soils overlain by loess. Agron. J. 95: 496-507.
11. Pozdnyakova, L., and R. Zhang. 1999. Geostatistical analyses of soil salinity in a large field. Precision Agric. 1(2): 153-165.
12. SAS Institute. 2001. SAS User's Guide. Version 8.2. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.
13. Sudduth, K. A., S. T. Drummond, and N. R. Kitchen. 2001. Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agric. 31(3): 239-264.
14. Sudduth, K. A., N. R. Kitchen, G. A. Bollero, D. G. Bullock, and W. J. Wiebold. 2003. Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity. Agron. J. 95: 472-482.
15. Williams, B. G., and G. C. Baker. 1982. An electromagnetical induction technique for reconnaissance surveys of soil salinity hazards. Australian J. Soil Res. 20(2): 107-118.