Development and validation of the effectiveness of the auditory rehabilitation scale

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 851-856

  Yueh, Bevan ^a,b,c   McDowell, Jennifer A ^a   Collins, Margaret ^a   Souza, Pamela E ^a   Loovis, Carl F ^a   Deyo, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ESTHETICS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; STATISTICS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 26844487473     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: 08864470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.10.851     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289:1976-1985.
2. US Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States. 117th ed. Washington, DC: US Dept of Commerce; 1997.
3. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:879-886.
4. Gates GA, Cooper JC Jr, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985, part I: basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear. 1990;11:247-256.
5. Kay DW, Roth M, Beamish P. Old age mental disorders in Newcastle upon Tyne, II: a study of possible social and medical causes. Br J Psychiatry. 1964;110:668-682.
6. LaForge RG, Spector WD, Sternberg J. The relationship of vision and hearing impairment to one-year mortality and functional decline. J Aging Health. 1992;4:126-148.
7. Carabellese C, Appollonio I, Rozzini R, et al. Sensory impairment and quality of life in a community elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:401-407.
8. Appollonio I, Carabellese C, Frattola L, Trabucchi M. Effects of sensory aids on the quality of life and mortality of elderly people: a multivariate analysis. Age Ageing. 1996;25:89-96.
9. Crews JE, Campbell VA. Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:823-829.
10. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43:661-668.
11. Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE, et al. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:188-194.
12. Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35:1402-1405.
13. Yueh B, Souza PE, McDowell JA, et al. Randomized trial of amplification strategies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:1197-1204.
14. Jerger J, Chmiel R, Florin E, Pirozzolo F, Wilson N. Comparison of conventional amplification and an assistive listening device in elderly persons. Ear Hear. 1996;17:490-504.
15. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982;3:128-134.
16. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16:176-186.
17. Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res. 1984;27:49-56.
18. Schum DJ. Test-retest reliability of a shortened version of the hearing aid performance inventory. J Am Acad Audiol. 1993;4:18-21.
19. Giolas TG, Owens E, Lamb SH, Schubert ED. Hearing performance inventory. J Speech Hear Disord. 1979;44:169-195.
20. Lamb SH, Owens E, Schubert ED. The revised form of the Hearing Performance Inventory. Ear Hear. 1983;4:152-157.
21. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:27-43.
22. Alpiner J, Chevrett W, Glascoe G, Mets M, Olsen B. The Denver Scale of Communication Function. Denver, Colo: University of Denver; 1974.
23. Tuley MR, Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Velez R. A critical reevaluation of the Quantified Denver Scale of Communication Function. Ear Hear. 1990;11:56-61.
24. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Res. 1986;29:515-535.
25. Garstecki DC, Erler SF. Older adult performance on the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:28-42.
26. Kaplan H, Bally S, Brandt F, Busacco D, Pray J. Communication Scale for Older Adults (CSOA). J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:203-217.
27. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41:30-35.
28. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear. 2001;22:151-160.
29. Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43:85-99.
30. Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear. 2003;24:424-439.
31. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1989.
32. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12(suppl 4):142S-158S.
33. Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983;48:379-384.
34. Cox RM. Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J. 1997;50:32-48.
35. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:424-427.
36. Horwitz AR, Turner CW. The time course of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1997;18:1-11.
37. Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92:1258-1268.
38. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:403-408.
39. Hulley SB, Cummings SR. Designing Clinical Research. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1988.
40. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1987.
41. Stewart MG, Jenkins HA, Coker NJ, Jerger JF, Loiselle LH. Development of a new outcomes instrument for conductive hearing loss. Am J Otol. 1997;18:413-420.
42. Stewart MG. Outcomes and patient-based hearing status in conductive hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(11, pt 2, suppl 98):1-21.