Automatic generation of Semantic fields for resource discovery in the Semantic web

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3588, Issue , 2005, Pages 706-715

  Navas, I ^b   Sanz, I ^a   Aldana, J F ^b   Berlanga, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Query distribution; Resource discovery; Similarity of ontologies

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATA THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA PROCESSING; EVALUATION; WORLD WIDE WEB; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; QUERY PROCESSING;

QUERY DISTRIBUTION; RESOURCE DISCOVERY; SEMANTIC WEBS; SIMILARITY OF ONTOLOGIES; AUTOMATIC GENERATION; INCREMENTAL CLUSTERING ALGORITHM; PRE-COMPUTATION; QUERY DISTRIBUTIONS; SEMANTIC FIELDS; SEMANTIC NETWORK;

SEMANTICS; SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 26844486207     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11546924_69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bertino, E. Guerrini, G., Mesiti, M.: A Matching Algorithm for Measuring the Structural Similarity between an XML Document and a DTD and its Applications. Information Systems 29(1), Pag. 23-46, 2004.
2. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic Distance in WordNet: An Experimental, Application-oriented Evaluation of Five Measures. Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, NAACL-2000. Pittsburgh, 2001.
3. Dalamagas, T., Cheng, T., Winkel, K-J., Sellis, T.: A methodology for clustering XML documents by structure. Information Systems. In Press.
4. Doan, A., et al.: Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web. VLDB Journal 12(4), Pag. 303-319, 2003.
5. Crespo, A., Garcia-Molina,H.: Semantic Overlay Networks for P2P Systems. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 2002.
6. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich M.: S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching. In Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium, ESWS 2004,Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2004.
7. Hong-Hai, D., Erhard, R.: COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches, Proc. 28th Intl. Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), Hongkong, 2002.
8. Hess,A., Johnston, E., Kushmerick, N.: ASSAM: A Tool for Semi-automatically Annotating Semantic Web Services. International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, 2004.
9. Navas, I., Roldán, M.M., Aldana, J.F.: Kreios: Towards Semantic Interoperable Systems. ADVIS 2004, Pag. 161-171, 2004.
10. Lee, M., Yang, L., Hsu, W., Yang, X.: XClust: clustering XML schemas for effective integration. In Proc. CIKM 2002, Pag. 292-299, 2002.
11. Sanz, I., Pérez, J.M, Berlanga, R., Aramburu, M.J.: XML Schemata Inference and Evolution. DEXA 2003, Pag. 109-118, Praga, 2003.
12. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-Based Ontology Alignment in OWL-Lite. ECAI 2004, Pag. 333-337, Valencia, 2004.
13. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. EKAW 2002, Pag. 251-263, Siguenza, 2002.
14. Rodriquez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.J.: Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge Data Engineering 15(2), Pag. 442-456, 2003.
15. Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
16. Yang, B., Garcia-Molina, H.: Comparing Hybrid Peer-to-peer systems. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Rome, Italy, 2001.