Programming and reprogramming sequence timing following high and low contextual interference practice

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 258-266

  Wright, David L ^a   Magnuson, Curt E ^a   Black, Charles B ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Motor learning; Motor planning; Motor programming; Precuing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

HUMANS; NEUROLINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 26844460612     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599297     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ballard, K. J. (2001). Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 3–20.
2. Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and learning of motor skills. Quest, 50, 266–293.
3. Dixon, P., & Just, M. A. (1986). A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions. Memory and Cognition, 14, 488–500.
4. Edwards, R. T., Elliott, D., & Lee., T. D. (1986). Contextual interference effects during skill acquisition and transfer in Down’s syndrome adolescents. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 3, 250–258.
5. Haaland, K. Y., Harrington, D. L., O’Brein, S., & Hermanowicz, N. (1997). Cognitive-motor learning in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology, 11, 180–186.
6. Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 835–841.
7. Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1991). Sequencing in Parkinson’s disease: Abnormalities in programming and controlling movements. Brain, 114, 99–115.
8. Immink, M. A., & Wright, D. L. (1998). Contextual interference: A response planning account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 735–754
9. Immink, M. A., & Wright, D. L. (2001). Motor programming during high and low contextual interference practice conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 423–437.
10. Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. Influence of order of stimulus presentation of speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653–668.
11. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51–59.
12. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 79–83.
13. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 730–746.
14. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks, (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Lee, T. D., Wishart, L. R., Cunningham, S., & Carnahan, H. (1997). Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 100–105.
16. Li., Y., & Wright, D. L. (2000). An assessment of the attention demands during random and blocked training schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 591–606.
17. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.Magnuson, C., Wright, D. L., & Ryu, Y. U. (2002). Generalized motor program learning: Effect of practice schedule. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, S107.
18. Porretta, D. L. (1988). Contextual interference effects on the transfer and retention of a gross motor skill by mildly mentally handicapped children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 5, 332–339.
19. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.
20. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231274). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.
22. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E. (1996). The effects of contextual interference on the acquisition and retention of logical rules. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 95–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (1996). The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 59–68.
24. Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145–157.
25. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on generalized motor program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139–152.
26. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
27. Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 145–366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. Smiley-Oyen, A. L., Worringham, C. J., & Cross, C. L. (2002). Practice effects in three-dimensional sequential rapid aiming in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 17, 1196–1204.
29. Verwey, W., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64–70.
30. Wright, D. L. (1991). The role of inter-task and intra-task processing on the acquisition of a motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 139–145.
31. Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Immink, M. A., Brueckner, S., & Magnuson, C. (2004). Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenating movement sequences during random but not blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 39–50.
32. Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Park, J-H., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Planning and executing simple movements: Contributions of relative and absolute time specification. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 273–285.
33. Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. (1997). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau, & Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106–109.
34. Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Whitacre, C. (1992). The contribution of elaborative processing to the contextual interference effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 30–37.