Tracing cross-cutting requirements via context-based constraints

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 80-90

  Bübl, Felix ^a   Balser, Michael ^b  

^a IMPHAR AG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTEFACTS; CONTEXT-BASED CONSTRAINTS; SYSTEM ELEMENTS;

ABSTRACTING; ALGORITHMS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

CONSTRAINT THEORY;

EID: 26844445668     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.2005.54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. F. Bübl. The context-based constraint language CCL for components. Technical Report 2002-20, Technical University Berlin, Germany, available at www.CoCons.org, October 2002.
2. F. Bübl. Introducing context-based constraints. In H. Weber and R.-D. Kutsche, editors, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE '02), Grenoble, France, volume 2306 of LNCS, pages 249-263, Berlin, April 2002. Springer.
3. th International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications (DOA), Catania, Sicily (Italy), volume 2888 of LNCS. Springer, November 2003.
4. S. Busse. Modellkorrespondenzen für die kontinuierliche Entwicklung mediatorbasierter Informationssysteme. PhD Thesis, Technical University Berlin, Germany, Logos Verlag, 2002.
5. L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2000.
6. N. Damianou. A policy framework for management of distributed systems. PhD Thesis, Imperial College, London, UK, 2002.
7. K. Devlin. Logic and Information. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991.
8. A. K. Dey. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Journal, 5(1):4-7, 2001.
9. O. Gotel and A. Finkelstein. An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In R. Arnold and S. Bohner, editors, Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.
10. G. Hirst. Context as a spurious concept. In Proceedings of the third workshop on Conference on Intelligent Processing and Computational Linguistics, Rio de Janeiro, Mexico City, pages 273-287, 2000.
11. V. Kashyap and A. P. Sheth. Schematic and semantic similarities between database objects: A context-based approach. Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) Journal, 5(4):276-304, 1996.
12. th International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications (DOA), Catania, Sicily (Italy), volume 2888 of LNCS. Springer, November 2003.
13. C. Nentwich, W. Emmerich, and A. Finkelstein. Static consistency checking for distributed specifications. In International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), Coronado Bay, CA, 2001.
14. J. D. Palmer. Traceability. In R. H. Thayer and M. Dorfman, editors, Software Requirements Engineering, pages 412-422. IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
15. B. Ramesh and M. Jarke. Toward reference models of requirements traceability. Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(1):58-93, 2001.
16. J. E. Robbins and D. F. Redmiles. Software architecture critics in the argo design environment. Knowledge-Based Systems. Special issue: The Best of IUI'98, 5(1):47-60, 1998.
17. S. Robertson and J. Robertson. Mastering the Requirements Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
18. A. P. Sheth and S. K. Gala. Attribute relationships: An impediment in automating schema integration. In Proc. of the Workshop on Heterogeneous Database Systems (Chicago, Ill., USA), December 1989.
19. M. Sloman and K. P. Twidle. Domains: A framework for structuring management policy. In M. Sloman, editor, Chapter 16 in Network and Distributed Systems Management, pages 433-453, 1994.
20. th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, pages 249-263. ACM Press, August 2001.