Three-dimensional images of contrast-enhanced MDCT for preoperative assessment of musculoskeletal masses: Comparison with MRI and plain radiographs

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 398-406

  Mori, Takeki ^a,b   Fujii, Masahiko ^a   Akisue, Toshihiro ^a   Yamamoto, Tetsuji ^a   Kurosaka, Masahiro ^a   Sugimura, Kazuro ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Kobe Red Cross Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multi detector computed tomography; Musculoskeletal mass; Preoperative assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSSIFICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SCHOOL CHILD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE NEOPLASMS; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE NEOPLASMS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 26644446446     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Crow K, Yang EL. Musculoskeletal imaging with multislice CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176: 979-986, 2001.
2. Hudson TM, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Pettersson H. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors: early experience in 31 patients compared with computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol, 13: 134-146, 1985.
3. Petasnick JP, Turner DA, Charters JR, Gitelis S, Zacharias CE. Soft-tissue masses of the locomotor system: comparison of MR imaging with CT. Radiology, 160: 125-133, 1986.
4. Cory DA, Ellis JH, Bies JR, Klatte EC, Colyer RA. Magnetic resonance imaging of extremity masses. Comput Radiol, 10: 99-106, 1986.
5. Weekes RG, Berquist TH, McLeod RA, Zimmer WD. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft-tissue tumors: Comparison with computed tomography. Magn Reson Imaging, 3: 345-352, 1985.
6. Tehranzadeh J, Mnaymneh W, Ghavam C, Morillo G, Murphy BJ. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 13: 466-472, 1989.
7. Pettersson H, Gillespy T 3rd, Hamlin DJ, et al. Primary musculoskeletal tumors: examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities. Radiology, 164: 237-241, 1987.
8. Aisen AM, Martel W, Braunstein EM, McMillin KI, Phillips WA, Kling TF. MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 146: 749-756, 1986.
9. Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, et al. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology, 202: 237-246, 1997.
10. Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM, Wang XL, Vanhoenacker F. Additional value of magnetic resonance with spin echo T1-weighted imaging with fat suppression in characterization of soft tissue tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 27: 434-441, 2003.
11. van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology, 233: 493-502, 2004.
12. van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Doornbos J, Bloem JL. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging, 15: 302-307, 2002.
13. Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, et al. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 178: 1429-1436, 2002.
14. Swan JS, Grist TM, Sproat IA, Heiner JP, Wiersma SR, Heisey DM. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: preoperative evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology, 194: 519-524, 1995.
15. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Sakaguchi T, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience. Radiology, 216: 909-915, 2000.
16. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology, 225: 43-52, 2002.
17. Yamamoto T, Kurosaka M, Soejima T, Fujii M. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical CT for soft tissue tumors in the extremities. Skeletal Radiol, 30: 384-387, 2001.
18. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics, 19: 745-764, 1999.
19. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, Fishman EK. Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol, 25: 207-214, 1996.
20. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics, 19: 1143-1160, 1999.
21. Pelc JS, Beaulieu CF. Volume rendering of tendon-bone relationships using unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176: 973-977, 2001.
22. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176: 861-864, 2001.