Auditing information structures in organizations: A review of data collection techniques for network analysis

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 429-453

  Zwijze Koning, Karen H ^a   De Jong, Menno D T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Communication audit; Methodology; Network analysis; Organizational communication; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 26644436005     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428105280120     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Alba, R. D. (1982). Taking stock of network analysis: A decade's results. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 39-74.
2. Albrecht, T. L., & Ropp, V. A. (1982). The study of network structuring in organizations through the use of method triangulation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 162-178.
3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
4. Atteslander, P. M. (1954). The interactio-gram: A method for measuring interaction and activities of supervisory personnel. Human Organization, 13, 28-33.
5. Bailey, S., & Marsden, P. V. (1999). Interpretation and interview context: Examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods. Social Networks, 21, 287-309.
6. Barrera, M. J. (1980). A method for the assessment of social support networks in community survey research. Connections, 3(3), 8-13.
7. Bass, L. A., & Stein, C. H. (1997). Comparing the structure and stability of network ties using the Social Support Questionnaire and the Social Network List. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 14, 123-132.
8. Bernard, H. R., & Killworth, P. D. (1977). Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Communication Research, 4, 3-18.
9. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495-517.
10. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailer, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive data. Social Networks, 2, 191-218.
11. Booth, A. (1986). Communications audits: A UK survey. Leicester, UK: Taylor Graham.
12. Booth, A. (1988). The communications audit. Cambridge, UK: Gower.
13. Bovasso, G. (1996). A network analysis of social contagion processes in an organizational intervention. Human Relations, 59, 1419-1435.
14. Brewer, D. D. (1995). Patterns in the recall of persons in a department of a formal organization. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 5, 255-284.
15. Brewer, D. D. (2000). Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Social Networks, 22, 29-43.
16. Brewer, D. D., & Webster, C. M. (1999). Forgetting of friends and its effect on measuring friendship networks. Social Networks, 21, 361-373.
17. Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869-898.
18. Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks, 6, 293-339.
19. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Conrath, D. W. (1973). Communications environments and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Science, 20, 586-603.
21. Conrath, D. W., Higgins, C. A., & McClean, R. J. (1983). A comparison of the reliability of questionnaire versus diary data. Social Networks, 5, 315-322.
22. Danowski, J. A., & Edison-Swift, P. (1985). Crisis effects on intra-organizational computer-based communication. Communication Research, 72, 251-270.
23. Davis, K. (1953). A method of studying communication patterns in organizations. Personnel Psychology, 6, 301-312.
24. Davis, K. (1968). Success of chain-of-command oral communication in a manufacturing management group. Academy of Management Journal, 2, 379-387.
25. Davis, K. (1978). Methods for studying informal communication. Journal of Communication, 25, 112-116.
26. DeWine, S., & James, A. C. (1988). Examining the communication audit: Assessment and modification. Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 144-169.
27. Downs, C. W. (1988). Communications audits. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
28. Downs, C. W., & Adrian, A. D. (2004). Assessing organizational communication: Strategic communication audits. New York: Guilford.
29. Downs, C., & Hazen, M. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14, 63-73.
30. Ellis, D., Barker, R., Potter, S., & Pridgeon, C. (1993). Information audits, communication audits and information mapping: A review and survey. International Journal of Information Management, 13, 134-151.
31. Eveland, T. K., & Bikson, J. D. (1987). Evolving electronic communication networks: An empirical assessment. Office: Technology and People, 3, 103-128.
32. Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., & Russell, H. M. (1977). Communicating and organizing. New York: Random House.
33. Feeley, T. H. (2000). Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 262-277.
34. Feeley, T. H., & Barnett, G. A. (1996). Predicting employee turnover from communication networks. Human Communication Research, 23, 370-387.
35. Ferligoj, A., & Hlebec, V. (1999). Evaluation of social network measurement instruments. Social Networks, 21, 111-130.
36. Freeman, L. C., Freeman, S. C., & Michaelson, A. G. (1988). On human social intelligence. Journal of Social Biological Structures, 11, 415-425.
37. Freeman, L. C., Freeman, S. C., & Michaelson, A. G. (1989). How humans see social groups: A test of the Sailer-Gaulin models. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 1, 229-238.
38. Freeman, L. C., & Romney, A. K. (1987). Words, deeds and social structure: A preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Human Organization, 46, 330-334.
39. Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., & Freeman, S. C. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 89, 310-325.
40. Freeman, L. C., White, D. R., & Romney, A. K. (1992). Research methods in social network analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
41. Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, R. M. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157.
42. Gaskell, G. D., Wright, D. B., & O'Muircheartaigh, C. A. (2000). Telescoping of landmark events: Implications for survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 77-89.
43. Goldhaber, G. M. (1993). Organizational communication. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
44. Goldhaber, G. M. (2002). Forum: Auditing the communication audit-Communication audits in the age of the Internet. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 451-457.
45. Goldhaber, G. M., & Rogers, D. P. (1979). Auditing organizational communication systems: The ICA communication audit. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
46. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380.
47. Greenbaum, H. H., Clampitt, P., & Willihnganz, S. (1988). Organizational communication: An examination of four instruments. Management Communication Quarterly 2, 245-282.
48. Hamilton, S. (1987). A communication audit handbook: Helping organizations communicate. New York: Longman.
49. Hammer, M. (1984). Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data. Social Networks, 6, 341-371.
50. Hanlon, M. D. (1980). Observational methods in organizational assessment. In E. Lawler, D. A. Nadler, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: Wiley.
51. Hargie, O., & Tourish, D. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of communication audits for organisations. London: Routledge.
52. Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research, 18, 323-342.
53. Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1101-1114.
54. Higgins, C. A., McClean, R. J., & Conrath, D. (1985). The accuracy and biases of diary communication data. Social Networks, 7, 173-187.
55. Hinrichs, J. R. (1964). Communication activity of industrial research personnel. Personnel Psychology, 17, 193-204.
56. Hlebec, V., & Ferligoj, A. (2001). Respondent mood and the instability of survey network measurements. Social Networks, 23, 125-139.
57. Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (1997). An emergent theory of structure and outcomes in small-firm strategic manufacturing networks. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 368-403.
58. Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303.
59. Jones, R. K. (2000). The unsolicited diary as a qualitative research tool for advanced research capacity in the field of health and illness. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 555-567.
60. Killworth, P. D., & Bernard, H. R. (1976). Informant accuracy in social network data. Human Organization, 35, 269-286.
61. Killworth, P. D., & Bernard, H. R. (1979). Informant accuracy in social network data III: A comparison of triadic structure in behavioral and cognitive data. Social Networks, 2, 10-46.
62. Kuhn, T., & Nelson, N. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5-38.
63. Lai, G., & Wong, O. (2002). The tie effect on information dissemination: The spread of commercial rumor in Hong Kong. Social Networks, 24, 49-75.
64. Lawler, E. E., Nadler, D. A., & Cammann, C. (1980). Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: Wiley.
65. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K. & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40, 133-146.
66. Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
67. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
68. Lucius, R. H., & Kuhnert, K. W. (1997). Using sociometry to predict team performance in the work place. Journal of Psychology, 131, 21-32.
69. Lundberg, C. G. (1975). Patterns of acquaintanceship in society and complex organization: A comparative study of the small world problem. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 206-221.
70. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
71. Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
72. Marsden, P. V. (2003). Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator. Social Networks, 25, 1-16.
73. Meyer, G. W. (1994). Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47, 1013-1048.
74. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
75. Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
76. Milardo, R. M. (1992). Comparative methods for delineating social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 447-461.
77. Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1, 61-67.
78. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001). Emergence of communication networks. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 440-502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
80. Moreno, J. (1953). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and sociodrama. New York: Beacon.
81. Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and inter-group conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377-401.
82. Odiorne, G. S. (1954). An application of the communication audit. Personnel Psychology, 7, 235-243.
83. Pollock, T. G., Whitbred, R. C., & Contractor, N. (2000). Social information processing and job characteristics: A simultaneous test of two theories with implications for job satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 26, 292-330.
84. Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
85. Rapkin, B. D., & Stein, C. H. (1989). Defining personal networks: The effect of delineation instructions on network structure and stability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 259-267.
86. Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 269-318.
87. Rice, R. E. (1994). Relating electronic mail use and network structure to R&D work networks and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 9-29.
88. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.
89. Rice, R. E., & Richards, W. D. (1985). An overview of network analysis methods and programs. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 105-165). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
90. Richardson, R. J., Erickson, B. H., & Nosanchuk, T. A. (1979). Community size, network structure, and the flow of information. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 4, 379-392.
91. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Rogers, E. M. (1987). Progress, problems and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies. Social Networks, 9, 285-310.
93. Rogers, E. M., & Argawala-Rogers, R. (1995). Communication networks in organizations. In S. R. Corman, S. P. Banks, C. R. Bantz, & M. E. Mayer (Eds.), Foundations of organizational communication: A reader (pp. 333-348). New York: Longman.
94. Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.). (1994). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York: Guilford.
95. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
96. Schwartz, D. F., & Jacobson, E. (1977). Organizational communication network analysis: The liaison communication role. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 158-174.
97. Schwartzbaum, A., & Gruenfeld, L. (1969). Factors influencing subject-observer interaction in an organizational study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 443-450.
98. Slack, F., & Rowley, J. (2001). Observation: Perspectives on research methodologies for leisure managers. Management Research News, 24, 35-42.
99. Stevenson, W. B., Davidson, B., Manev, I., & Walsh, K. (1997). The small world of the university: A classroom exercise in the study of networks. Connections, 20, 23-33.
100. Stevenson, W. B., & Gilly, M. C. (1991). Information processing and problem solving: The migration of problems through formal positions and networks of ties. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 918-928.
101. Stevenson, W. B., & Gilly, M. C. (1993). Problem-solving networks in organizations: Intentional design and emergent structure. Social Science Research, 22, 92-113.
102. Sudman, S. (1985). Experiments in the measurement of the size of social networks. Social Networks, 7, 127-151.
103. Sudman, S. (1988). Experiments in measuring neighbor and relative social networks. Social Networks, 10, 93-108.
104. Thurman, B. (1976). In the office: Networks and coalitions. Social Networks, 2, 47-63.
105. Tichy, N., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Network analysis in organizational settings. Human Relations, 32, 923-965.
106. Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (2000). Communication and organisational success. In O. Hargie & D. Tourish (Eds.), Handbook of communication audits for organisations (pp. 3-21). London: Routledge.
107. Tracey, E. M., & Catalane, R. F. (1990). Reliability of social network data. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 26, 33-35.
108. Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32, 425-443.
109. Tuire, P., & Erno, L. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relationships within an educational research community. A finish case. Higher Education, 42,493-513.
110. Van Gemert, L., & Woudstra, E. (1999). Designing a strategic communication plan. Communication, 25(1/2), 73-87.
111. Van Sonderen, E., Ormel, J., Brilman, E., & Van Linden van den Heuvel, C. (1990). Personal network delineation: A comparison of the "exchange," "affective" and "role relation" approach. In K. C. P. M. Knipscheer & T. C. Antonucci (Eds.), Social network research: Substantive issues and methodological questions (pp. 101-120). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
112. Van Tilburg, T. (1998). Interviewer effects in the measurement of personal network size: A nonexperimental study. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 300-328.
113. Vinten, G. (1994). Participant observation: A model for organizational observation? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 9, 30-38.
114. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (Eds.). (1999). Unobtrusive measures (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
116. Weenig, M. W. H. (1999). Communication networks in the diffusion of an innovation in an organization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1072-1092.
117. Wickesberg, A. K. (1969). Communication networks in the business organization structure. Academy of Management Journal, 11, 253-262.
118. Zack, M. H., & McKenney, J. L. (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organization Science, 6, 394-422.
119. Zimmerman, D. H., & Wieder, D. L. (1977). The diary: Diary-interview method. Urban Life, 5, 479-498.