The politics of litigation by state attorneys general: Introduction to mini-symposium

Law and Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 425-428

  Mather, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26644435852     PISSN: 02658240     EISSN: 14679930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0265-8240.2003.00157.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Chen, Paul (2003) “The Institutional Sources of State Success in Federalism Litigation before the Supreme Court” Law & Policy 25: 455-72.
2. Clayton, Cornell W. (1994) “Law, Politics, and the New Federalism: State Attorneys General as National Policymakers,” Review of Politics 56: 525-53.
3. Mather, Lynn (1998) “Theorizing About Trial Courts: Lawyers, Policymaking, and Tobacco Litigation,” Law and Social Inquiry 23: 897-940.
4. Morris, Thomas R. (1987) “The States before the Federal Courts,” Judicature 70: 298-305.
5. Ray, Leonard and Rorie L. Spill (2002) “The States in Federal Appellate Court: Litigation Trends Over Time,” Justice System Journal 23: 97-108.
6. Schmeling, Thomas A. (2003) “Stag Hunting with the State AG: Anti-Tobacco Litigation and the Emergence of Cooperation Among State Attorneys General,” Law & Policy 25: 429-54.
7. Spill, Rorie L., Michael J. Licari, and Leonard Ray (2001) “Taking on Tobacco,” Political Research Quarterly 54: 605-22.
8. Waltenburg, Eric N., and Bill Swinford (1999) Litigating Federalism: The States Before the U.S. Supreme Court. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
9. Zimmerman, Joseph F. (1998) “Interstate Cooperation: The Roles of the State Attorneys General,” Publius 28(1):71-89.