Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging of diseased vertebrae: Analysis of three parameters and the distribution of the time-intensity curve patterns

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 632-638

  Tokuda, Osamu ^a   Hayashi, Noriko ^a   Taguchi, Koutarou ^a   Matsunaga, Naofumi ^a  

^a YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Perfusion MR imaging; Time intensity curve; Vertebra

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; METASTASIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE TUMOR; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FRACTURES, SPONTANEOUS; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 26644432486     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-005-0949-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Totty WG, Murphy WA, Lee JKT. Soft tissue tumors: MR imaging. Radiology 1986; 160:135-141. 3715024
2. Crim JR, Seeger LL, Yao L, et al. Diagnosis of soft-tissue masses be differentiated from malignant ones? Radiology 1992;185: 581-586. 1410377
3. Sundaram M, McGuire MH, Schajowicz F. Soft-tissue masses: Histologic basis for decreased signal (short T2) on T2-weighted images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:1247-1250. 3034013
4. Erlemann R, Reiser MF, Peters PE, et al. Musculoskeletal neoplasm: static and dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171:767-773. 2717749
5. Erlemann R, Sciuk J, Bosse A, et al. Response of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. Radiology 1990; 175:791-796. 2188300
6. Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, et al. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesion: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 1994; 192:835-843. 8058957
7. Cova M, Kang YS, Tsukamoto H, et al. Bone marrow perfusion evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic fast MR imaging in a dog model. Radiology 1991; 179:535-539. 2014306
8. Fletcher BD, Hanna SL, Fairclough DJ, et al. Pediatric musculoskeletal tumors: Use of dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging to monitor response to chemotherapy. Radiology 1992; 184:243-248. 1319075
9. Van Der Woude HJ, Verstraete KL, Hoendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Hermans J, Bloem JL. Musculoskeletal tumors: Does fast dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging contribute to the characterization? Radiology 1998; 208:821-828. 9722866
10. Bollow VM, Knauf W, Korfel A, et al. Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:241-250. 9039623
11. Konig H, Sieper J, Wolf K. Rheumatoid arthritis: Evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1990; 176:473-477. 2367663
12. Verstraete KL, Van der Woude HJ, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: Basic principles and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:311-321. 9132096
13. Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, et al. Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI: In comparison with compression fracture and metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:308-314. 10.1002/jmri.10063
14. Shin TT, Huang KM, Li YW. Solitary vertebral collapse: Distinction between and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:635-642. 10.1002/ (SICI)1522-2586(199905)9:5<635::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO;2-E
15. Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ, et al. Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 172:215-218. 2740506
16. Shin TT, Tsuang YH, Huang KM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of vertebral compression fractures. J Formos Med Assoc 1996; 95:313-319. 8935301
17. Chen WT, Shih TTF, Chen RC, Lo SY, Chou CT, Lee JM, et al. Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Significance of aging and sex. Radiology 2001; 220:213-218. 11426000
18. Wolf GL. Contrast agents in spine and body MRI: Introduction. In: Hasso AN, Stark DD, eds. American Roentgen Ray Society - Categorical course syllabus: Spine and body magnetic resonance imaging - 1991. Reston, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society, 1991:11-115.
19. Chen WT, Shin TTF, Chen RC, Lo SY, Chou CT, Lee JM, Tu HY. Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Significance of aging and sex. Radiology 2001; 220:213-218. 11426000
20. Montazel JL, Divine M, Lepage E, Kobeiter H, Breil S, Rahmouni A. Normal spinal bone marrow in adults: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 229:703-709. 14593190
21. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, Lane B, Enzman DR. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: Assessment with conventional spine-echo, chemical shift, and STIR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174:495-502. 2296658
22. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, Bartl R, Krodel A, Reiser M, Deimling M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: Differentiation benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998; 207:349-356. 9577479
23. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G, van Vaals J, Guenther RW. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:351-358. 11159073
24. Cruses RL, Dumount J. Healing of bone, tendon and ligament. In: Rockwood Jr CA, Green DP, eds. Fractures. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1975:97-98.