Investigation of preference between the least-angle strategy and the initial segment strategy for route selection in unknown environments

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3343, Issue , 2005, Pages 79-97

  Hochmair, Hartwig H ^a   Karlsson, Victoria ^b  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ROADS AND STREETS; URBAN PLANNING;

STREET NETWORK; URBAN DESKTOP ENVIRONMENT; WAYFINDING STRATEGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 26444581244     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (1996). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin: Springer
2. Bailenson JN, Shum MS, Uttal DH (1998). Road Climbing: Principles Governing Asymmetric Route Choices on Maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 251-264
3. Bailenson JN, Shum MS, Uttal DH (2000). The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Memory and Cognition 28 (2): 306-318
4. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999). Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions. In R Hall (Ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 5-34
5. Bose P, Morin P (1999). Online routing in triangulations, ISAAC, Vol. 1741. Springer, Berlin, pp. 113-122
6. Christenfeld N (1995). Choices from identical options. Psychological Science 6: 50-55
7. Dalton RC (2001). The Secret is to Follow Your Nose. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta. A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan
8. Freuder EC, Wallace RJ (1992). Partial Constraint Satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence 58 (1-3): 21-70
9. Hochmair HH, Frank AU (2002). Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks - analyzing the least-angle strategy. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2 (4): 283-313
10. Janzen G, Herrmann T, Katz S, Schweizer K (2000). Oblique Angles Intersections and Barriers: Navigating through a Virtual Maze. In C Freksa, W Brauer, KF Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition 2, LNCS 1849. Springer, Berlin, pp. 277-294
11. Kranakis E, Singh H, Urrutia J (1999). Compass Routing on Geometric Networks, 11th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (electronic proceedings)
12. Løvås GG (1998). Models of Wayfinding in Emergency Evacuations. European Journal of Operational Research 105 (3): 371-389
13. Luce R (1959). Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis. New York: J. Wiley and Sons
14. Moratz R, Freksa C (1998). Spatial Reasoning with Uncertain Data Using Stochastic Relaxation. In W Brauer (Ed.), Fuzzy-Neuro-Systems. Infix, St. Augustin, pp. 106-112
15. Poole D, Mackworth A, Goebel R (1998). Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press
16. Rudová H, Murray K (2002). University Course Timetabling with Soft Constraints. In E Burke, PD Causmaecker (Eds.), 4th international conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2002), KaHo St.-Lieven, Gent, pp. 73-89
17. Thorndyke P, Hayes-Roth B (1981). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14: 560-589