Experience with an all-polyethylene total knee arthroplasty in younger, active patients with follow-up from 2 to 11 years

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2005, Pages 7-11

  Ranawat, Amar S ^a   Mohanty, Shubhranshu S ^a   Goldsmith, Scott E ^a   Rasquinha, Vijay J ^a   Rodriguez, Jose A ^a   Ranawat, Chitranjan S ^a  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

All polyethylene; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 26444579812     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. N.L. Parks, G.A. Engh, and L.D.T. Topoleski Modular tibial insert micromotion: a concern with contemporary knee implants Clin Orthop 356 1998 10
2. J.A. Rodriguez, H. Bhende, and C.S. Ranawat Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study Clin Orthop 388 2001 10
3. G.S. Gill, A.B. Joshi, and D.M. Mills Total condylar knee arthroplasty: 16-21-year results Clin Orthop 367 1999 210
4. M.W. Pagnano, B.A. Levy, and D.J. Berry Cemented all polyethylene tibial components in patients age 75 years and older Clin Orthop 367 1999 73
5. D.L. Pomeroy, L.A. Schaper, and W.E. Badenhausen Results of all-polyethylene tibial components as a cost-saving technique Clin Orthop 380 2000 140
6. P. Udomkiat, L.D. Dorr, and W. Long Matched-pair analysis of all-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components J Arthroplasty 16 2001 689
7. F.C. Ewald The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation scoring system Clin Orthop 248 1989 9
8. D.L. Bartel, A.H. Burstein, and E.A. Santavicca Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg 64A 1982 1026
9. D.M. Appel, J.M. Tozzi, and L.D. Dorr Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop 273 1991 243
10. J. Rand Comparison of metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 8 1993 307
11. T.J. Gioe, and K.R. Bowman A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components Clin Orthop 380 2000 108
12. G. Adalberth, K.G. Nilsson, and S. Bystrom All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised RSA study J Bone Joint Surg 83B 2000 825
13. J.A. Rodriguez, N. Baez, and V. Rasquinha Metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee replacement Clin Orthop 392 2001 174
14. S. Najibi, R. Iorio, and J.W. Surdam All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome J Arthroplasty 18 7 Suppl 1 2003 9
15. P.M. Faris, M.A. Ritter, and E.M. Keating The AGC all-polyethylene tibial component: a ten-year clinical evaluation J Bone Joint Surg 85A 2003 489