Molecular strategies for identifying human papillomavirus infection in routinely processed samples: Focus on paraffin sections

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 219-224

  Nonogaki, Suely ^a   Wakamatsu, Alda ^a   Longatto Filho, Adhemar ^a,b   Roteli Martins, Cecília ^c   Di Loreto, Celso ^a   Sakamoto Maeda, Marina Yoshiê ^a   Utagawa, Maria Lúcia ^a   Pereira, Sônia Maria Miranda ^a   Polli, Sabrina ^a   Alves, Venâncio A F ^a,d   Syrjänen, Kari ^e  

^a INSTITUTO ADOLFO LUTZ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c HOSPITAL MATERNIDADE LEONOR MENDES DE BARROS   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^e TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; HPV; Hybrid capture; PCR

Indexed keywords

BETA GLOBIN; PARAFFIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONDYLOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; VIRUS DETECTION; WART VIRUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPSY; BRAZIL; CERVIX UTERI; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; GLOBINS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PARAFFIN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCLEROSING SOLUTIONS; VIRAL LOAD;

EID: 26444574933     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.lgt.0000179861.67574.6b     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2003;361:2217-25.
2. Monsonego J, Bosch FX, Coursaget P, Cox JT, Franco E, Frazer I, et al. Cervical cancer control, priorities and new directions. Int J Cancer 2004;108:329-33.
3. Bohmer G, van den Brule AJ, Brummer O, Meijer CL, Petry KU. No confirmed case of human papillomavirus DNA-negative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or invasive primary cancer of the uterine cervix among 511 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:118-20.
4. Iftner T, Villa LL. Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;31:80-8.
5. Schiffman M, Castle PE. Human Papillomavirus: epidemiology and public health. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:930-4.
6. Witt A, Hudelist G, Gregor H, Kucera E, Walchetseder C, Czerwenka K. The detection of HPV DNA improves the recognition of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003;268:29-34.
7. Arbyn M, Buntinx F, van Ranst M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Dillner J. Virologic versus cytologie triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:280-93.
8. Nonogaki S, Wakamatsu A, Longatto Filho A, Pereira SMM, Utagawa ML, Alves VAF, et al. Hybrid Capture II and polymerase chain reaction for identifying HPV infections in samples collected in a new collection medium: a comparison. Acta Cytol 2004;48:514-20.
9. Cricca M, Bonvicini F, Venturoli S, Ambretti S, Gallinella G, Gentilomi G, et al. Efficient treatment of paraffin-embedded cervical tissue for HPV DNA testing by HC-II and PCR assays. J Clin Virol 2004;29:137-40.
10. de Roda-Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol 1995;76:1057-62.
11. Pinto AP, Villa LL. A spin cartridge system for DNA extraction from paraffin wax embedded tissues. Mol Pathol 1998;51:48-9.
12. Greer CE, Peterson SL, Kiviat NB, Manos MM. PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: effects of fixative and fixation time. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;95:117-24.
13. Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Alessi TQ, Wheeler CM, Coutlee F, Hildesheim A, et al. Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:357-61.
14. Cox JT, Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH, Sherman ME, Cullen A, Kurman RJ. Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:946-54.
15. Howard M, Sellers J, Kaczorowski J, Lorincz A. Optimal cuttoff of the hybrid capture II human papillomavirus test for self-collected vaginal, vulvar, and urine specimens in a colposcopy referral population. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 2004;8:33-7.
16. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9.
17. Tavassoli FA, Deville P. Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.
18. Unger ER, Vernon SD, Lee DR, Miller DL, Reeves WC. Detection of human papillomavirus in archival tissues: comparison of in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. J Histochem Cytochem 1998;46:535-40.
19. Peyton CL, Schiffman M, Lorincz AT, Hunt WC, Mielzynska I, Bratti C, et al. Comparison of PCR-and hybrid capture-based human papillomavirus detection systems using multiple cervical specimen collection strategies. Clin Microbiol 1998;36:3248-54.
20. Rabelo-Santos SH, Levi JE, Derchain SF, Sarian LO, Zeferino LC, Messias S, et al. DNA recovery from Hybrid Capture II samples stored in specimen transport medium with denaturing reagent, for the detection of human papillomavirus by PCR. J Virol Methods 2005;126:197-201.
21. Qu W, Jiang G, Cruz Y, Chang CJ, Ho GY, Klein RS, et al. PCR detection of human papillomavirus: comparison between MY09/11 and GP5+/GP6+ primer systems. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1304-10.
22. Kulmala SM, Syrjänen S, Shabalova I, Petrovichev N, Kozachenko V, Podistov J, et al. and the NTS Cohort Study Group. Human papillomavirus testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay and PCR as screening tools. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:2470-5.
23. Clavel C, Masure M, Putaud I, Thomas K, Bory JP, Gabriel R, et al. Hybrid capture II, a new sensitive test for human papillomavirus detection. Comparison with hybrid capture I and PCR results in cervical lesions. J Clin Pathol 1998;51:737-40.
24. Vernon SD, Unger ER, Williams D. Comparison of human papillomavirus detection and typing by cycle sequencing, line blotting, and hybrid capture. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:651-5.