In vitro evaluation of the performance of Korean pulsatile ECLS (T-PLS) using precise quantification of pressure-flow waveforms

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 604-608

  Lee, Jung Joo ^a,b   Lim, Choon Hak ^b   Son, Ho Sung ^a,b   Kim, Hyun Koo ^c   Hwang, Chang Mo ^a   Park, Yong Doo ^a   Moon, Ki Chul ^a   Kwak, Young Tae ^b   Sun, Kyung ^a,b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; BLOOD; HEMODYNAMICS; OXYGENATORS; PUMPS;

EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; PERFUSION ANALYSIS; PULSATILES; TWIN-PULSE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM (T-PLS);

MEDICAL IMAGING;

AORTA PRESSURE; BLOOD PUMP; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DEVICE; ENERGY; EVALUATION; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KOREA; OXYGENATOR; PERFORMANCE; PRESSURE; PULSATILE FLOW; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TISSUE PERFUSION; WAVEFORM;

AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ENERGY METABOLISM; EVALUATION STUDIES; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; KIDNEY; KOREA; PERFUSION; PULSATILE FLOW; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 26444560979     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000176240.78374.16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Lee HS, Rho YR, Lee HS, et al: In vivo evaluation of the pulsatile ECLS system. J Artif Organs 6: 25-29, 2003.
2. Rho YR, Choi H, Lee JC, et al: Applications of the pulsatile flow versatile ECLS: In vivo studies. Int J Artif Organs 26: 428-435, 2003.
3. Kim HK, Son HS, Fang YH, et al: The effects of pulsatile flow upon renal tissue perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparative study of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. ASAIO J 51: 30-36, 2005.
4. Son HS, Sun K, Fang YH, et al: The effects of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile extracorporeal circulation on the pattern of coronary artery blood flow during cardiac arrest. Int J Artif Organs 28: 609-616, 2005.
5. Undar A: Myths and truths of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support. Artif Organs 28: 439-443, 2004.
6. Klotz S, Schmid C: Arterial pressure and pump flow rate during long-term pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiac support: Reply. Ann Thorac Surg 79: 1094, 2005.
7. Baba A, Dobsak P, Saito I, et al: Microcirculation of the bulbar conjunctiva in the goat implanted with a total artificial heart: Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. ASAIO J 50: 321-327, 2004.
8. Brandes H, Albes JM, Conzelmann A, et al: Comparison of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion of the lung in an extracorporeal large animal model. Eur Surg Res 34: 321-329, 2002.
9. Sezai A, Shiono M, Orime Y, et al: Major organ function under mechanical support: Comparative studies of pulsatile and non-pulsatile circulation. Artif Organs 23: 280-285, 1999.
10. Undar A, Zapanta CM, Reibson JD, et al: Precise quantification of pressure flow waveforms of a pulsatile ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 51: 56-59, 2005.
11. Undar A: Energy equivalent pressure formula is for precise quantification of different perfusion modes. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 1777-1778, 2003.
12. Undar A: Universal and precise quantification of pulsatile and nonpulsatile pressure flow waveforms is necessary for direct and adequate comparisons among the results of different investigators. Perfusion 18: 135-136, 2003.
13. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
14. Wright G: Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 58: 1199-1204, 1994.