Equatives and deferred reference

Language

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 262-289

  Ward, Gregory ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444554567     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2004.0102     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. ABBOTT, BARBARA. 2004. Definiteness and indefiniteness. Handbook of pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 122-49. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. APRESJAN, JURI D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142.5-32.
3. ARIEL, MIRA. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
4. BIRNER, BETTY J.; JEFFREY P. KAPLAN; and GREGORY WARD. 2001. Open propositions and epistemic would. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Washington, DC, January 2001.
5. BIRNER, BETTY J., and GREGORY WARD. 1994. Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20.93-102.
6. BIRNER, BETTY J., and GREGORY WARD. 1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. BURZIO, LUIGI. 1992. On the morphology of reflexives and impersonals. Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics, ed. by Christiane Laue fer and Terrell Morgan, 399-414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology, ed. by Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits, 183-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. CLARK, HERBERT H. 1977. Bridging. Thinking: Readings in cognitive science, ed. by Philip Johnson-Laird and Peter Wason, 411-20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. COPESTAKE, ANN, and TED BRISCOE. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12.15-67.
11. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1994. Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. GEACH, PETER T. 1962. Reference and generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
13. GRICE, H. PAUL. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
14. GROSZ, BARBARA, and CANDACE L. SIDNER. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12.175-204.
15. GUNDEL, JEANETTE, and THORSTEIN FRETHEIM. 2004. Topic and focus. Handbook of pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 175-96. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. GUNDEL, JEANETTE; NANCY HEDBERG; and RON ZACHARSKI. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69.274-307.
17. HAWKINS, JOHN A. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
18. HAWKINS, JOHN A. 1991. On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27.405-42.
19. HEYCOCK, CAROLINE, and ANTHONY KROCH. 1997. Inversion and equation in copular sentences. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 10.71-87.
20. HIGGINS, FRANCIS ROGER. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York: Garland.
21. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1978. Grammar as evidence for conceptual structure. Linguistic theory and psychological reality, ed. by Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller, 201-28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. JOSEPH, BRIAN D. 1979. On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics 17.519-23.
25. KADMON, NIRIT. 1990. Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13.273-324.
26. KADMON, NIRIT. 2001. Formal pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. KEHLER, ANDREW, and GREGORY WARD. 1999. On the semantics and pragmatics of 'identifier so'. The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view (Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface 1), ed. by Ken Turner, 233-56. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. KEHLER, ANDREW, and GREGORY WARD. 2004. Constraints on ellipsis and event reference. Handbook of pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 383-403. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. KRIPKE, SAUL. 1972/1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. KUNO, SUSUMU. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. LAKOFF, GEORGE, and MARK JOHNSON. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. LAMBRECHT, KNUD. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. LANGACKER, RONALD. 1984. Active zones. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10.172-88.
34. LEECH, GEOFFREY. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
35. LEWIS, DAVID. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8.339-59.
36. LIDZ, JEFFREY. 2001. Condition R. Linguistic Inquiry 32.123-40.
37. LIEBER, ROCHELLE. 1990. On the organization of the lexicon. New York: Garland.
38. MILL, JOHN STUART. 1848. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive; being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. New York: Harper & Brothers.
39. NORVIG, PETER, and GEORGE LAKOFF. 1987. Taking: A study in lexical network theory. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13.195-205.
40. NUNBERG, GEOFFREY. 1977. The pragmatics of reference. New York: City University of New York dissertation.
41. NUNBERG, GEOFFREY. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3.143-84.
42. NUNBERG, GEOFFREY. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12.109-32.
43. OSTLER, NICHOLAS, and B. T. S. ATKINS. 1992. Predictable meaning shift: Some linguistic properties of lexical implication rules. Lexical semantics and knowledge representation, ed. by James Pustejovsky and Sabine Bergler, 87-100. Berlin: Springer.
44. PARTEE, BARBARA H. 1978. Bound variables and other anaphors. Proceedings of TINLAP-2, 79-85.
45. POSTAL, PAUL. 1969. Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5.205-39.
46. PRINCE, ELLEN F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. Radical pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223-54. New York: Academic Press.
47. PRINCE, ELLEN F. 1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. Chicago Linguistic Society 22.208-22.
48. PRINCE, ELLEN F. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text, ed. by Sandra Thompson and William Mann, 295-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. PUSTEJOVSKY, JAMES. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. RECANATI, FRANÇOIS. 2003. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. ROBERTS, CRAIGE. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26.287-350.
52. ROCHEMONT, MICHAEL. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. RUSSELL, BERTRAND. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14.479-93.
54. SAG, IVAN. 1981. Formal semantics and extralinguistic context. Radical pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 273-94. New York: Academic Press.
55. SIDNER, CANDACE. 1979. Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
56. STALLARD, DAVID. 1993. Two kinds of metonymy. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 87-94. Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.
57. VALLDUVÍ, ENRIC. 1992. The informational component. New York: Garland.
58. VERSPOOR, CORNELIA MARIA. 1997. Contextually-dependent lexical semantics. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
59. WARD, GREGORY. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. New York: Garland.
60. WARD, GREGORY; RICHARD SPROAT; and GAIL MCKOON. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67.439-74.
61. WARD, GREGORY, and SAM TILSEN. 2002. Deferred equatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, January 2002.
62. WEBBER, BONNIE L. 1979. A formal approach to discourse anaphora. New York: Garland.