Work load, job control and risk of leaving work by sickness certification before delivery, Norway 1989

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 193-201

  Strand, Kitty ^a   Wergeland, Ebba ^a   Bjerkedal, Tor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; NORWAY; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; RISK FACTOR; SHIFT WORKER; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKLOAD;

EID: 26444523163     PISSN: 14034948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/140349489702500308     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hauge Lundby I, Tellnes G., Stray-Pedersen B. Pregnancy and sick-leave. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1988; 108 (27): 2291-4.
2. Grünfeld B., Qvigstad E. Disease during pregnancy. Sick-listing among pregnant women in Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1991; 111 (10): 1269-1272.
3. Strand K., Wergeland E., Endresen E.H., Bjerkedal T. Factors associated with workstatus of pregnant employees in Norway 1989. In: Wijma K and von Schoultz B, editors. Reproductive Life: Advances in research in psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaeocology. Canforth: The Parthenon Publishing Group,; 1992. p. 617-623.
4. Sydsjo A., Sydsjo G., Wijma B. High sickness absence during pregnancy in spite of well developed parental leave insurance, (in Swedish) Läkartidningen 1989; vol 86, no 47: 4141-4.
5. Alexanderson K., Hensing G., Leijon M., et al. Pregnancy-related sickness absence in a Swedish county, 1985–87. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994; 48: 464-470.
6. Kierkegaard O., Kristiansen J.L. Sick-leave during pregnancy-focusing on textile workers. Ugeskr Laeger 1992; 154 (34): 2306-8.
7. Voigt S. Sick-listing in pregnancy: Extent, diagnostic pattern and the issuing authority. Ugeskr Laeger 1993; 155 (2): 86-89.
8. Conne-Perréard E., Bousquet A. Prescription of temporary sick leave to pregnant women in the absence of legal provisions. Revue D'Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique 1992; 40 (2): 113-120.
9. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M. Pregnant women's working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: A national study in France. Br J Ind Med 1987; 44: 236-243.
10. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Subtil D., Kaminski M. Is preterm delivery still related to physical working conditions in pregnancy? J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 29-34.
11. Tellnes G. Days lost by Sickness Certification. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989; 7: 245-251.
12. Spyckerelle Y., Trudel M., Deschamps J.P. Pregnancy and work: apropos of sick leave. Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique 1989; 84 (11): 743-6.
13. Soutoul J., et al. The social protection of pregnant women and young mothers in Europe. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 1991; 20 (6): 757-765.
14. Saurel-Cobizolles MJ, Romito P., Garcia J. Description of maternity rights for working women in France, Italy and in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Public Health 1993; 3: 48-53.
15. Social Security in the Nordic Countries. Scope, expenditure and financing 1990. Statistical Reports of the Nordic Countries 59; NOSOSO 1993.
16. The Norwegian Social Insurance Scheme-A survey January 1995. Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
17. Forplantningsskader og arbeidsmiljo. Forskrift til arbeidsmiljoloven. Best nr. 535 (in Norwegian). Oslo: Arbeidstilsynet. 1995.
18. Wergeland E., Strand K., Endresen E.H. “Pregnant in Norway at the entrance of the nineties”, a national survey Norway 1989. Rapport nr. 1. (in Norwegian) Oslo: Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Oslo,; 1991.
19. Strand K., Wergeland E., Bjerkedal T. Pregnancy and work, a national survey Norway 1989. Representativity of study sample and responders. Working paper. Oslo: Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Oslo,; 1995.
20. Rosner Bernard. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. PWS Publishers,; 1982 (86).
21. Brennan P., Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992; 304: 1491-4.
22. Hosmer D., Lemenshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1989.
23. SPSS/PC+4.0. The statistical package for IBM PC. Chicago 1990. SPSSinc.
24. Reidy A. Questioning the status quo: Sickness absence research so far claims more than it should. Soc Sci Med 1990; vol 31 (4): 421-432.
25. Kristensen T. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: An analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med 1991; Vol 32(1): 15-27.
26. North F., Syme S.L., Feeney A., Head J., Shipley M.J., Marmot M.G. Explaining sosioeconomic differences in sickness absence: the Whitehall II study. BMJ 1993; 306: 361-6.
27. Hauge Lundby I, Stray-Pedersen B, Tellnes G. Diagnoses among pregnant women certified sick. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1991; 111: 2833-6.
28. Hatch M., Stein Z.A. Work and exercise during pregnancy: Epidemiological studies. In: Mittelmark RA, Wiswell RA, Drinkwater B: (eds) Exercise in pregnancy. Baltimore: Williams and Wilins; 1991.
29. Schaumburg I. Ergonomi og reproduktionsskader (in Danish) AT-rapport nr 1–1994. Kobenhavn: Arbejdstilsynet; 1994.
30. Ahlborg G. Physical workload and pregnancy outcome. JOEM 1995; 37: 941-4.
31. Østgaard H.C., Andersson G.B., Karlsson K. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 1991; 16 (5): 549-552.
32. Endresen E. Pelvic Pain and Low Back Pain in Pregnant Women-an Epidemiological Study. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24: 135-141.
33. Wergeland E., Strand K. Working conditions and prevalence of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynecology Obstetrics (in press).
34. Brandt L.P.A., Nielsen C.V. Job stress and Adverse Outcome of Pregnancy: A Causal Link or Recall Bias? Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 302-311.
35. Wiktorin C., Selin K., Ekenvall L., Alfredsson L. and the Music-Norrtälje Study Group. An Interview Technique for Recording Work Postures in Epidemiological Studies. International Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 25: 171-180.
36. Romito P. Women's paid and unpaid work and pregnancy outcome: a dicussion of some open questions. Health Promotion 1989; 4 (1): 31-41.