The crime of genocide in the ICTR jurisprudence

Journal of International Criminal Justice

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 989-1006

  Akhavan, Payam ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444522279     PISSN: 14781387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqi060     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Judgment, Akayesu (ICTR 96-4-T), Trial Chamber I, 2 September 1998.
2. UN Information Centre (Pretoria), Statement by U.N Secretary-General Kofi Annan on the Occasion of the Announcement of the First Judgement in a Case of Genocide by the International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda. UN doc. PR/10/98/UNIC, 1998.
3. Judgment, Kambanda (ICTR 97-23-S), Trial Chamber I, 4 September 1998, §16.
4. See Art. 12 (2) ICTRSt.
5. See, e.g. Hersch Lauterpacht's remark that 'to a considerable extent, the [Genocide] Convention amounts to a registration of protest against past misdeeds of individual savagery rather than to an effective instrument of their prevention or repression' in L. Oppenheim, International Law: A Treatise, H. Lauterpacht (ed.), Vol. I (8th edn, London: Longmans, 1955).
6. 'Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide', 78 UNTS 277 (1951).
7. See Akayesu, supra note 1, §496, where the Chamber notes 'that Rwanda acceded, by legislative decree, to the Convention on Genocide on 12 February 1975'. For a record of accession to the Convention, see http://www.ohchr.org/english/countries/ratification/1.htm (visited 13 April 2005).
8. Akayesu, supra note 1, §495;
9. see also the Judgment in Musema (ICTR 96-13-A), Trial Chamber I, 27 January 2000, §151
10. and in Rutaganda (ICTR 96-3), Trial Chamber I, 6 December 1999, §46.
11. 'Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide', Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1951. It should be noted that the Akayesu (supra note 1), Musema and Rutaganda (supra note 8) decisions also refer to the ICTY's Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808. UN doc. S/25704, 1993, §45, which states: 'The Convention is today considered part of international customary law as evidenced by the International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1951'. Thus, the ICTY Secretary-General's Report also relies on the ICJ Advisory Opinion in asserting the customary law character of the prohibition against genocide.
12. ICJ Reports 1951, at 23.
13. R.S. Clark, 'Crimes against Humanity', in G. Ginsburgs and V.N. Kudriavtsev (eds), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1990), at 194.
14. 999 UNTS 171.
15. M. Bossuyt, Guide to the Travaux Préparatoirs of the ICCPR (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1987), at 331.
16. See, e.g. T. Meron, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford: Clarendon,1989), at 8-9.
17. Judgment, Kayishema (ICTR-95-1-T), Trial Chamber II, 21 May 1999, §91.
18. See Art. 30(2)(b) ICCSt.
19. Musema, supra note 8, §164;
20. see also Akayesu, supra note 1, §518.
21. Musema, supra note 8, §166.
22. Judgement, Rutaganda (ICTR-96-3 A), Appeals Chamber, 26 May 2003, §524.
23. Akayesu, supra note 1, §520.
24. Ibid., § 517-520.
25. See Kayishema, supra note 15, §92.
26. Akayesu, supra note 1, §479.
27. Ibid., §485.
28. Ibid., §540.
29. See, e.g. Judgment, Krstić (IT-98-33-A), Appeals Chamber, 19 April 2004, §141.
30. It may be noted that the crime of genocide under Art. 6 ICCSt. does not include the punishable acts under Art. III of the Convention. The acts are subsumed by Art. 25 - a general provision on individual criminal responsibility - although Art. 25(3)(e) retains direct and public incitement to genocide' as a distinct category.
31. Krstić, supra note 28, §139.
32. Ibid., §139.
33. Ibid., §140.
34. Ibid., §143.
35. See, e.g. Musema, supra note 8, at §192, stating that 'the requisite intent for the crime of conspiracy to commit genocide is, ipso facto, the intent required for the crime of genocide, that is the dolus specialis of genocide'.
36. Ibid., §194, stating that 'the crime of conspiracy to commit genocide is punishable even if it fails to produce a result, that is to say, even if the substantive offence, in this case genocide, has not actually been perpetrated'.
37. See also Akayesu, supra note 1, §560, stating that 'the person who is inciting to commit genocide must have himself the specific intent to commit genocide'.
38. See, e.g. Akayesu, supra note 1, §562, stating that 'genocide clearly falls within the category of crimes so serious that direct and public incitement to commit such a crime must be punished as such, even where such incitement failed to produce the result expected by the perpetrator'.
39. See, e.g. Rutaganda, supra note 8, §34, stating that 'attempt is by definition an inchoate crime, inherent in the criminal conduct per se irrespective of its result'.
40. See Musema, supra note 8, §172, where the Chamber 'notes from the Travaux Préparatoires of the Genocide Convention that the crime of complicity in genocide was recognised only where genocide had actually been committed. The Genocide Convention did not provide the possibility for punishment of complicity in an attempt to commit genocide, complicity in incitement to commit genocide nor complicity in conspiracy to commit genocide, all of which were, in the view of some States, too vague to be punishable under the Convention'.
41. See, e.g. Musema, supra note 8, §198, holding that 'the crime of conspiracy was included to punish acts which, in and of themselves, did not constitute genocide. The converse implication of this is that no purpose would be served in convicting an accused, who has already been found guilty of genocide, for conspiracy to commit genocide, on the basis of the same acts';
42. but see the Judgement in Nahimana (ICTR-99-52-T), Trial Chamber I, 3 December 2003, holding all accused guilty of both genocide and conspiracy to commit genocide;
43. see also Akayesu, supra note 1, §562, holding that 'the fact that such acts are in themselves particularly dangerous because of the high risk they carry for society, even if they fail to produce results, warrants that they be punished as an exceptional measure' and §675 where the Chamber finds that 'the direct and public incitement to commit genocide as engaged in by Akayesu, was indeed successful', thus considering it to be a separate ground for liability in addition to genocide.
44. Akayesu, supra note 1, §497.
45. Judgment, Jelisić (IT-95-10-T), Trial Chamber I, 14 December 1999, §100.
46. See Report of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court, Addendum, Elements of Crimes, UN doc. PCNICC/2000/1 (2000), Article 6 at 6-8.
47. Although Art. 21(1)(a) ICCSt. include the Elements of Crimes as part of the applicable law, Art. 9(1) provides that they 'shall assist the Court in the interpretation' of crimes within the ICC's jurisdiction.
48. Article 10 expressly provides: 'Nothing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in any way existing or developing rules of international law for purposes other than this Statute'.
49. Musema, supra note 8, §166.
50. Kambanda, supra note 3, §16.
51. Judgement, Kayishema (ICTR-95-1-A), Appeals Chamber, 1 June 2001, §367
52. H. Wechsler, W.K. Jones and H.L. Korn, 'The Treatment of Inchoate Crimes in the Model Penal Code of the American Law Institute: Attempts, Solicitation and Conspiracy', in 61 Columbia Law Review (1961) 571, at 579.
53. See, e.g. Krstić, supra note 28, § 6-23.
54. Kayishema, supra note 15, §96.
55. See Judgment, Bagilishema (ICTR 95-1A-T), Trial Chamber I, 7 June 2001, §64
56. and Judgment, Semanza (ICTR 97-20-T), Trial Chamber III, 15 May 2003, §316.
57. Krstić, supra note 28, §13.
58. See Art. 22(2) ICCSt.
59. See Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, GAOR, 50th Sess., Supp. No. 22, UN doc. A/50/22 (1995), § 60-61.
60. Akayesu, supra note 1, §80.
61. Ibid., §81.
62. Ibid., §82.
63. Ibid., §83.
64. Ibid.
65. See Summary Records of the meetings of the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly. UN doc. GAOR, 21 September-10 December 1948, 3rd Sess., 6th Committee, 97.
66. Akayesu, supra note 1, §513.
67. Ibid., §516.
68. Ibid., §702.
69. Kayishema, supra note 15, §98.
70. Ibid., §523.
71. Rutaganda, supra note 8, §56.
72. Ibid., §57.
73. Musema, supra note 8, §165.
74. ICTY Judgement, Kupreškić (IT-95-16-T), Trial Chamber II, 14 January 2000, §636.
75. Kayishema, supra note 47, §151.
76. Akayesu, supra note 1, 502.
77. Ibid., §504.
78. Kayishema, supra note 15, §109.
79. Akayesu, supra note 1, § 706-707 and § 711-712.
80. Ibid., §505.
81. Ibid., §506.
82. Ibid., §507.
83. Ibid.
84. Ibid., §509.
85. See Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Forty-Eighth Session. UN doc. A/51/10,6 May-26 July 1996, GAOR, 51st Sess., Supp. No. 10, 91.
86. See Draft Convention on the Crime of Genocide, UN doc. E/447 (1947), 6-7.
87. See L. Kuper, Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), at 12 (referring to Winston Churchill's statement that the Holocaust was a 'crime without a name').