Shape optimization of shell roofs subjected to strong wind by using a variable complexity model

Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures

Volumn 46, Issue 148, 2005, Pages 108-115

  Ogawa, Toshiyuki ^a   Ohsaki, Makoto ^b   Miyamura, Tomoshi ^c   Kumagai, Tomohiko ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Response Surface Method; Shape Optimization; Shell; Variable Complexity Model; Wind Load

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COSTS; DEFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WIND EFFECTS;

RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; VARIABLE COMPLEXITY MODEL; WIND LOAD;

SHELLS (STRUCTURES);

EID: 26444516034     PISSN: 03043622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. E. Ramm, Shape finding methods of shells, Bulletin of Int. Assoc. for Shell and Spatial Struct, Vol. 33, pp. 89-98, 1992.
2. M. Ohsaki and M. Hayashi, Fairness metrics for shape optimization of ribbed shells, J. Int. Assoc. Shells and Spatial Struct., Vol. 41(1), pp. 31-39, 2000.
3. M. Ohsaki, T. Ogawa and R. Tateishi, Shape optimization of curves and surfaces considering fairness metrics and elastic stiffness, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 24, pp. 449-456, 2003, Erratum: Vol. 25, pp. 250-258, 2004.
4. M. G. Hutchinson, E. R. Unger, W. H.Mason, B. Grossman and R. T. Haftka, Variable-complexity aerodynamic optimization of a high-speed civil transport wing, J. Aircraft, Vol. 31(1), pp. 110-116, 1994.
5. E. R. Unger, M. G. Hutchinson, M. Rais-Rohani, R. T. Haftka and B. G. Grossman, Variable-complexity multidisciplinary design of a transport wing, Int. J. System Automation: Research and Appl., Vol. 2, pp. 87-113, 1992.
6. H. Hasegawa and S. Sakai, A simulation of the approximate optimization for crash analysis by using the variable complexity modeling, Trans. of JSCES, Paper No. 20030003, Vol. 5, pp. 125-130, 2003.
7. M. E. Eleshaky and O. Baysal, Airfoil shape optimization using sensitivity analysis on viscous flow equations, J. Fluid Eng., ASME, Vol. 115, pp. 75-84, 1993.
8. C. C. Item and O. Baysal, Wing section optimization for supersonic viscous flow, J. Fluid Eng., ASME, Vol. 120, pp. 102-108, 1998.
9. Proc.Fourth AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA, 1992.
10. S. Ohta, A. Maruoka, H. Hirano and M. Kawahara, Numerical fluid flow analysis of 3-dimensional flow around circular cylinder at sub-critical range, Proc. 14th National Symp. on Wind Engng. pp. 199-204, 1996. (in Japanese)
11. T. Ogawa, M. Nakayama, K. Masuda and I. Mochizuki, Numerical simulation and experimental study on dynamic behavior of cylindrical dome roofs in strong wind, Proc. IASS 40th Anniversary Congress, Vol.2, E1.71-E1.80, 1999.
12. G. Farin, Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design, 3rd ed., Academic Press, 1992.
13. W. J. Roux, N. Stander and R. T. Haftka, Response surface approximation for structural optimization, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., Vol. 42, pp. 517-534, 1998.
14. DOT User's Manual, Ver 5.0, VR&D, 1999.