One-stop cardiovascular diagnostic imaging (and radiation dose)

Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 450-453

  Conti, C Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT; RADIOISOTOPE; THALLIUM 201;

CANCER RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EXERCISE TEST; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 26444515035     PISSN: 01609289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960281002     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Conti CR: Hemodynamics, coronary angiography, and ventriculography can obviate the need for noninvasive studies in many patients with ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 1997;20(10):827-828
2. Conti CR: Selective coronary angiography: 42 years later. Clin Cardiol 2001;24,269-270
3. Conti CR: What can we learn from diagnostic tests that visualize the coronary arteries? Clin Cardiol 2004;27:487-488
4. Hecht H: Computed tomographic angiography coming of age. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:838-842
5. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(3):552-557
6. Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service: Clinical and business aspects. Prepared jointly by the British Cardiac Society, The British Nuclear Cardiology Society, and the British Nuclear Medicine Society. Heart 2005;91(suppl IV):iv6-iv14
7. Mahnten AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Wildberger JE, Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Gunther RW, Kuhl HP: Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarctioin using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45: 2042-2047
8. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou KM, Paul S, Wintersperger B, Reiser M, Becker CR, Steinbeck G, Bockstegers P: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-154
9. Achenbach S, Daniel WG: Computed tomography of the coronary arteries. More than meets the eye. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:154-157
10. Kuiper JS, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NA, Teeuwisse W, Pattynama PM: Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: Comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur. Radiol 2003;13(7):1491-1493
11. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, Budde T, Erbel R, Ewen K, Barkhausen J: Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003;226(1):145-152
12. Schuijf JD, Shaw LJ, Wijns W, Lamb HJ, Poldermans D, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ: Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: Differing modalities. Heart 2005;91(8):1110-1117
13. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, Pasquet A, Grandin C, Van Beers BE, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL: Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensonal navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:92-100