Influence of vision on the evaluation of marginal discrepancies in restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 598-601

  Hayashi, M ^a,d   Watts, D C ^b   Ebisu, S ^a   Wilson, N H F ^c  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH DISEASE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DIAGNOSIS, ORAL; LENSES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MODELS, STRUCTURAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 26444488608     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hayashi M & Wilson NH (2003) Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite European Journal of Oral Science 111(2) 155-162.
2. Hayashi M, Wilson NHF, Ebisu S & Watts DC (2005) Influence of explorer tip diameter in identifying restoration margin discrepancies Journal of Dental Research (in press).
3. L'Estrange PR, Karlsson SL, Odman P, Stegersjo G & Engstrom B (1991) Clinical evaluation of restoration margins by an endoscopic microscope Australian Dental Journal 36(6) 415-420.
4. Rappold AP, Ripps AH & Ireland EJ (1992) Explore sharpness as related to margin evaluations Operative Dentistry 17(1) 2-6.
5. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J & Wilson NH (1999) Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report Journal of Dentistry 27(1) 13-19.
6. Whitehead SA & Wilson NH (1992) Restorative decision-making behavior with magnification Quintessence International 23(10) 667-671.