Steady states analysis and dynamic simulation as a complement in the HAZOP study of chemical reactors

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 83, Issue 5 B, 2005, Pages 463-471

  Svandova Z ^a   Jelemensky L ^a   Markos J ^a   Molnar A ^a  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

CSTR; HAZOP; Multiple steady states; Nonlinear behaviour; Safety analysis; Stability analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HAZARDS; HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROPYLENE;

CSTR; HAZOP; MULTIPLE STEADY STATES; NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR; SAFETY ANALYSIS; STABILITY ANALYSIS;

CHEMICAL REACTORS;

EID: 26444485494     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1205/psep.04262     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. AIChE/CCPS, 1995, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 2nd edition with Worker Examples (AIChE, New York, USA).
2. Balakotaiah, V. and Luss, D., 1982, Structure of the steady-state solutions of lumped-parameter chemically reacting systems, Chem Eng Sci, 37(11): 1611-1623.
3. Fair, W.W. and Aris, R., 1986, "Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him?" - Reflections on the multiplicity of steady states of the stirred tank reactor, Chem Eng Sci, 41(6): 1385-1402.
4. Fencott, C. and Hebbron, B.D., 1995, The application of HAZOP studies to integrated requirements models for control systems, ISA Transactions, 34(3): 297-308.
5. Fogler, H.S., 1999, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (Prentice Hall, Inc., London, UK).
6. Froment, G.F. and Bischoff, K.B., 1990, Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, 2nd edition (Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, USA).
7. Holodniok, M., Klíč, A., Kubíček, M. and Marek, M., 1986, Methods of analysis of nonlinear dynamic models (Academia Praha. Prague, Czech Republic).
8. Kletz, T., 1999, Hazop and Hazan, Identifying and assessing process industry standards, 4th edition (IChemE. Rugby, UK).
9. Kubíček, M., 1976, Algorithm 502. Dependence of solution of nonlinear systems on a parameter [C5], ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2(1): 98-107.
10. Lees, F.P., 1996, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control (Reed Educational and Professional Publishing, UK).
11. Marek, M. and Schreiber, I., 1991, Chaotic Behavior of Deterministic Dissipative Systems (Academia, Praha, Prague, Czech Republic).
12. Molnár, A., Markoš, J. and Jelemenský, L., 2003, Safety analysis of CSTR towards changes in operating conditions, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 16(5): 373-380.
13. Paladino, O. and Ratto, M., 2000, Robust stability and sensitivity of real controlled CSTRs, Chem Eng Sci, 55: 321-330.
14. Schmitz, R.A., 1974, Multiplicity, stability and sensitivity of states in chemically reacting systems - a review, 3rd International Congress on Chemical Reaction Engineering, Evanston, III. In Advances in Chemistry Series, 148.
15. Sullivan J.C. (ed.), 1993, Propanediols, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, VCH Publishers, A22.
16. Van Heerden, C., 1953, Autothermic processes. Ind Eng Chem, 45: 1242-1247.