|
Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 953-955
|
Consequences of different diagnostic 'gold standards' in test accuracy research: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome as an example
|
Author keywords
Carpal tunnel syndrome; Reference standards; ROC curve; Sensitivity and specificity; Ultrasonography
|
Indexed keywords
RESEARCH;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
OUTCOMES RESEARCH;
PATIENT CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARDIZATION;
TASK PERFORMANCE;
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME;
EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
ROC CURVE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 26444460834
PISSN: 03005771
EISSN: 14643685
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi105 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (38)
|
References (5)
|