A framework for classification of change approaches based on a comparison of process improvement models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3547, Issue , 2005, Pages 29-38

  Vinter, Otto ^a  

^a DELTA Danish Electronics Light & Acoustics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; MANAGERS; MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CLASSIFICATION OF CHANGE; LIFE-CYCLE MODEL; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT MODELS; PROJECT MANAGERS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 26444459779     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11497455_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cooper, R. B., Zmud, R. W.: Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science, Vol. 36 No. 2, (1990), 123-139
2. Davenport, T. H.: Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press (1993)
3. Hammer M.: Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, July-August (1990), 104-112
4. International Organization for Standardization: Information Technology - Software process assessment - Part 1: Concepts and introductory guide. ISO/IEC TR 15504-1:1998(E) (1998)
5. International Organization for Standardization: Information Technology - Software process assessment - Part 7: Guide for use in process improvement. ISO/IEC TR 15504-7:1998(E) (1998)
6. Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T .C.: Conducting Business Process Change: Recommendations from a Study of 25 Leading Approaches. Process Think: Winning perspectives for Business Change in the Information Age, Grover & Kettinger (eds.), Idea Group Publishing, (2000)
7. Kinnula, A.: Software Process Engineering Systems: Models and Industry Cases. Oulu University Press, (2001). URL:http://herkules.oulu.fi/ isbn9514265084/
8. Kinnula, A., Kinnula, M.: Comparing SPI Activity Cycles to SPI Program Models in Multisite Environment. Proceedings of the PROFES'04 Conference, (2004)
9. Malhotra, Y.: Business Process Redesign: An Overview. IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, (1998)
10. McFeely, R.: IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement. CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, (1996)
11. Muthu, S., Whitman, L., Cheragi, S. H.: Business Process Reengineering: A Consolidated Methodology. Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice (1999)
12. Paulk, M.C., Weber, C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass (1995)
13. SM Model: A Practical Guide for Improvement. (1997), URL: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ideal/ideal.bridge. html
14. Software Engineering Institute: Improving Technology Adaptation Using INTRo. (2003), URL:http://www.sei.cmu.edu/intro/documents/users-guide.doc
15. Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.: The Impact of Critical Success Factors across the Stages of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (2001)
16. Somers, T.M., Nelson, K.: A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle. Information & Management 41, Elsevier, (2004)
17. Stoica M., Chawat, N., Shin, N.: An Investigation of the Methodologies of Business Process Reengineering. Proceedings of the ISECON 2003 Conference, EDSIG (2003)
18. Vinter, O., Pries-Heje, J. (eds.): På vej mod at blive bedre til at blive bedre - Talent@IT projektet. DELTA Report D-266, Hørsholm, Denmark, (2004)