Dimensional approaches to designing better experimental ecosystems: A practitioners guide with examples

Oecologia

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 216-224

  Petersen, John E ^a   Englund, Göran ^b  

^a OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dimensional analysis; Experimental design; Extrapolation; Mesocosm; Primary productivity; Scale

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENCLOSURE EXPERIMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MESOCOSM; PRIMARY PRODUCTION;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY SIZE; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCE; TIME;

BODY SIZE; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NATURE; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 26444452163     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0062-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adey WH, Loveland K (1991) Dynamic aquaria: building living ecosystems. Academic, San Diego
2. Bergström U, Englund G (2002) Estimating predation rates in experimental systems: scale- dependent effects of aggregative behavior. Oikos 97:251-259
3. Bergström U, Englund G (2004) Spatial scale, heterogeneity and functional response. J Anim Ecol 73:487-493
4. Carpenter SR (1999) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: reply. Ecology 80:1085-1088
5. Cohen JE, Tilman D (1996) Biosphere 2 and biodiversity: the lessons so far. Science 274:1150-1151
6. Cooke GD (1967) The pattern of autotrophic succession in laboratory microcosms. Bioscience 17: 717-721
7. Doering PH, Oviatt CA, Nowicki BL, Klos EG, Reed LW (1995) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of primary production in a simulated estuarine gradient. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 124:271-287
8. Duarte CM, Maso M, Merino M (1992) The relationship between mesoscale phytoplankton heterogeneity and hydrographic variability. Deep-Sea Res 39:45-54
9. Englund G, Cooper SD (2003) Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments. Adv Ecol Res 92:161-213
10. Enriquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K, Nielsen SL (1996) Broad-scale comparison of photosynthetic rates across phototrophic organisms. Oecologia 108:197-206
11. Estrada M, Alcaraz M, Marrase C (1987) Effect of reversed light gradients on the phytoplankton composition in marine microcosms. Inv Pesq 51:443-458
12. Gervais F, Hintze T, Behrendt H (1999) An incubator for the simulation of a fluctuating light climate in studies of planktonic primary productivity. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:49-60
13. 14C methods for measuring primary production: gross underestimates in oceanic water. Neth J Sea Res 13:58-78
14. Gilbert F, Gonzalez A, Evans-Freke I (1998) Corridors maintain species richness in the fragmented landscapes of a microecosystem. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 265:577-582
15. Hastings A (1990) Spatial heterogeneity and ecological models. Ecology 71:426-42
16. Have A (1990) Microslides as microcosms for the study of ciliate communities. T Am Microsc Soc 109:129-140
17. Helms SE, Hunter MD (2005) Variation in plant quality and the population dynamics of herbivores: there is nothing average about aphids. Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0060-1
18. Hines AH, Whitlatch RB, Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ, Dayton PK, Legendre P (1997) Nonlinear foraging response of a large marine predator to benthic prey: eagle ray pits and bivalves in a New Zealand sandflat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 216:191-210
19. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27: 343-383
20. Inouye BD (2005) Scaling up from local competition to regional coexistence across two scales of spatial heterogeneity: insect larvae in the fruits of Apeiba membranacea. Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0059-7
21. Ives AR, Foufopoulos J, Klopfer ED, Klug JL, Palmer TM (1996) Bottle or big-scale studies: how do we do ecology? Ecology 77:681-685
22. Kaiser H (1983) Small scale spatial heterogeneity influences predation success in an unexpected way: model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Acarina). Oecologia 56:249-256
23. Kareiva P (1989) Renewing the dialogue between theory and experiments in population ecology. In: Roughgarden J et al. (eds) Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 68-88
24. Kemp WM, Lewis MR, Cunningham FF, Stevenson JC, Boynton WR (1980) Microcosms, macrophytes, and hierarchies: environmental research in the Chesapeake Bay. In: Giesy JP (ed) Microcosms in ecological research. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, pp 911-936
25. Langhaar HL (1951) Dimensional analysis and theory of models. Wiley, New York
26. Lawton JH (1995) Ecological experiments with model systems. Science 269:328-331
27. Lewis MR, Cullen JJ, Platt T (1984) Relationships between vertical mixing and photoadaptation of phytoplankton: similarity criteria. Mar Ecol-Progr Ser 15:141-149
28. Luckett C, Adey WH, Morrissey J, Spoon DM (1996) Coral reef mesocosms and microcosms - successes, problems and the future of laboratory models. Ecol Eng 6:57-72
29. Luckinbill LS (1973) Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54: 1320-1327
30. Margalef R (1967) Laboratory analogues of estuarine plankton systems. In: Lauff G (ed) Estuaries. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, pp 515-521
31. Melbourne BA, Chesson P (2005) Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data. Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0058-8
32. Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390: 507-509
33. Naeem S, Li SB (1998) Consumer species richness and autotrophic biomass. Ecology 79:2603-2615
34. Nixon SW, Alonso D, Pilson MEQ, Buckley BA (1980) Turbulent mixing in aquatic mesocosms. In: Giesy JP (ed) Microcosms in ecological research. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, pp 818-849
35. Peeters JCH, Arts F, Escaravage V, Haas HA, de Jong JEA, van Loon R, Moest B, van der Put A (1993) Studies on light climate, mixing and reproducibility of ecosystem variables in mesocosms: consequences for the design. In: Peeters JCH et al.(eds) The impact of marine eutrophication on phytoplankton and benthic suspension feeders: results of a mesocosm pilot study. Eienst Getijde wateren, Middelburg, pp 7-23
36. Persson L (1991) Behavioral-response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:101-105
37. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
38. Petersen JE, Hastings A (2001) Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems: designing mousetraps to catch elephants. Am Nat 157:324-333
39. Petersen JE, Kemp W, Bartelson R, Boynton W, Chen C-C, Cornwell J, Gardner R, Hinkle D, Houde E, Malone T, Mowitt W, Murray L, Sanford L, Stevenson J, Sundberg K, Suttles S (2003) Multiscale experiments in coastal ecology: improving realism and advancing theory. Bioscience 53:1181-1197
40. Rijkeboer M, Gons HJ, Kromkamp J (1993) Preservation of the light-field in turbid lake and river water in laboratory-scale enclosure. J Plankton Res 15:517-530
41. Sanford LP (1997) Turbulent mixing in experimental ecosystem studies. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 161: 265-293
42. Schindler DW (1998) Replication versus realism: the need for ecosystem-scale experiments. Ecosystems 1: 323-334
43. Schmitz OJ (2005) Scaling from plot experiments to landscapes: studying grasshoppers to inform forest ecosystem management. Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0063-y
44. Sheldon RW, Prakash A, Sutcliffe WHJ (1972) The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnol Oceangr 17:323-340
45. Sugihara G, May RM (1990) Applications of fractals in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 5:79-86
46. Thomas CD, Kunin WE (1999) The spatial structure of populations. J Anim Ecol 68:647-657
47. Turpin DH, Harrison PJ (1979) Limiting nutrient patchiness and its role in phytoplankton ecology. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 39:151-166
48. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284:1677-1679