The factor graph network model for biological systems

Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3500, Issue , 2005, Pages 31-47

  Gat Viks, Irit ^a   Tanay, Amos ^a   Raijman, Daniela ^a   Shamir, Ron ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FEEDBACK; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OSMOSIS; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS; GENES; GRAPH THEORY; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS;

FEEDBACK LOOPS; GENOMEWIDE MEASUREMENTS; HYPER-OSMOTIC SHOCK; INFERENCE ALGORITHMS;

BIOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; GRAPH NETWORK MODEL; PROBABILISTIC MODELING;

EID: 26444437862     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11415770_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Z. Bar-Joseph, G.K. Gerber, T.I. Lee, N.J. Rinaldi, J.Y. Yoo, F. Robert, D.B. Gordon, E. Fraenkel, T.S. Jaakkola, R.A. Young, and D.K. Gifford. Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks. Nature Biotechnology, 21:1337-1342, 2003.
2. M.A. Beer and S. Tavazoie. Predicting gene expression from sequence. Cell, 117:185-198, 2004.
3. K.C. Chen et al. Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell, 11:369-91, 2000.
4. G. Cooper. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42:393-405, 1990.
5. M.W. Covert, E.M. Knight, J.L. Reed, M.J. Herrgard, and B.O. Palsson. Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks. Nature, 429:92-96, 2004.
6. N. Friedman, M. Linial, I. Nachman, and D. Pe'er. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comp. Biol., 7:601-620, 2000.
7. N. Friedman, K. Murphy, and S. Russell. Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. In Proc. 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence., pages 139-147, 1998.
8. I. Gat-Viks, A. Tanay, and R. Shamir. Modeling and analysis of heterogeneous regulation in biological networks. In Proceedings of the first Annual RECOMB Satellite Workshop on Regulatory Genomics, pages 21-31, 2004. Also J. Comput Biol in press.
9. A. Hartemink, D. Gifford, T. Jaakkola, and R. Young. Combining location and expression data for principled discovery of genetic regulatory networks. In Proceedings of the 2002 Pacific Symposioum in Biocomputing (PSB 02), pages 437-449, 2002.
10. S Hohmann. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev., 66(2):300-72, 2002.
11. S. Imoto, T. Higuchi, T. Goto, K. Tashiro, S. Kuhara, and S. Miyano. Combining microarrays and biological knowledge for estimating gene networks via Bayesian networks. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 2:77-98, 2004.
12. S. Imoto, S. Kim, T. Goto, S. Aburatani, K. Tashiro, S. Kuhara, and S. Miyano. Bayesian network and nonparametric heteroscedastic regression for nonlinear modeling of genetic network. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 1:231-252, 2004.
13. T.S. Jaakkola. Tutorial on variational approximation methods. In D. Saad and M. Opper, editors, Advanced Mean Field Methods - Theory and Practice, pages 129-160. MIT Press, 2001.
14. F.R. Kschischang, B.J. Frey, and Loeliger H. Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47:498-519, 2001.
15. D. J. C. MacKay. Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. In M. I. Jordan, editor, Learning in Graphical Models, pages 175-204. Kluwer Academic Press, 1998.
16. I. Nachman, A. Regev, and N. Friedman. Inferring quantitative models of regulatory networks from expression data. Bioinformatics, 20:248-256, 2004.
17. S.M. O'Rourke and I. Herskowitz. Unique and redundant roles for hog mapk pathway components as revealed by whole-genome expression analysis. Mol Biol Cell., 15(2):532-42, 2004.
18. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann publishers, inc, 1988.
19. M. Proft and R. Serrano. Repressors and upstream repressing sequences of the stress-regulated ena1 gene in saccharomyces cerevisiae: bzip protein sko1p confers hog-dependent osmotic regulation. Mol Biol Cell., 19:537-46, 1999.
20. M. Rep, M. Krantz, J.M. Thevelein, and S. Hohmann. The transcriptional response of saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock, hot1p and msn2p/msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J. Biol Chem, 275:8290-8300, 2000.
21. M. Rep, V. Reiser, U. Holzmller, J.M. Thevelein, S. Hohmann, G. Ammerer, and H. Ruis. Osmotic stress-induced gene expression in saccharomyces cerevisiae requires msn1p and the novel nuclear factor hot1p. Mol. Cell. Biol, 19:5474-5485, 1999.
22. M. Ronen, R. Rosenberg, B. Shraiman, and U. Alon. Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 99:10555-10560, 2002.
23. E. Segal, M. Shapira, A. Regev, D. Pe'er, D. Botstein, D. Koller, and N. Friedman. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet., 34(2): 166-76, 2003.
24. V.A. Smith, E.D. Jarvis, and A.J. Hartemink. Evaluating functional network inference using simulations of complex biological systems. Bioinformatics, 18:216-224, 2002.
25. A. Tanay and R. Shamir. Computational expansion of genetic networks. Bioinformatics, 17:8270-8278, 2001.
26. A. Tanay and R. Shamir. Modeling transcription programs: inferring binding site activity and dose-response model optimization. J. Comp. Biol., 11:357-375, 2004.
27. C.H. Yeang, T. Ideker, and T. Jaakkola. Physical network models. J Comput Biol., 11(2-3):243-62, 2004.
28. S. Yedidia, WT. Freeman, and Y. Weiss. Constructing free energy approximations and generalized belief propagation algorithms. Technical Report TR-2004-040, Mitsubishi electric resaerch laboratories, 2004.