Learning in a new computerized testing system

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 436-443

  Park, Jooyong ^a  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Assessment; Computerized testing; Feedback; Learning; Recall; Testing phenomenon

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444435776     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.436     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 148-156.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
3. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues - Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 396-401). London: Wiley.
4. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-73.
6. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
7. Clariana, R. B. (2003). The effectiveness of constructed-response and multiple-choice study tasks in computer aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 395-406.
8. Clariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 23-36.
9. Cooper, A. J. R., & Monk, A. (1976). Learning for recall and learning for recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 131-156). New York: Wiley.
10. Costa, A. L., & Kullick, B. (2004). Assessment strategies for self-directed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
12. Dempster, F. (1996). Encoding and retrieval practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Foos, P. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal cf Educational Psychology, 80, 179-183.
15. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Bleasdale, F. A. (1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 213-216.
16. Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399.
17. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
18. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
19. Lachman, R., & Laughery, K. R. (1968). Is a test trial a training trial in free recall learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 40-50.
20. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
21. Lhyle, K. G., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1987). Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 320-322.
22. Mandler, G. (1979). Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary (pp. 293-327). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371-385.
24. Nungester, R. J., & Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 18-22.
25. Page, E., & Petersen, N. S. (1995). The computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 561-565.
26. Park, J. (2004, April 15). Testing phenomenon in the computerized modified multiple-choice testing system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
27. Park, J., & Choi, B. (2004). Learning at home using a new computerized testing system. Unpublished manuscript, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
28. Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A. B., & Kreupeling, W. J. (1985). Effects of informative feedback in relation to retention of initial responses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 303-313.
29. Rudner, L. M. (2002). Measurement decision theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30. Rudner, L. M., & Liang, T. (2002). Automated essay scoring using Bayes' theorem. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 7(2). Retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/ journal/v1n2.shtml
31. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
32. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
33. Williams, J. (1963). Comparison of several response modes in a review program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 253-260.
34. Williams, J. (1965). Effectiveness of constructed-response and multiple-choice programming modes as a function of test mode. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 111-117.