Distribution and reproductive success of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to forest patch size and vegetation characteristics; the effect of scale

Ibis

Volumn 140, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 214-222

  Huhta, Esa ^a   Jokimäki, Jukka ^b   Rahko, Pekka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST; HABITAT PREFERENCE; PATCH SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA;

EID: 2642642967     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1998.tb04382.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S. & Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighbourhoods: Scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340-346.
2. Alatalo, R.V. & Lundberg, A. 1984. Density dependence in breeding success of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 969-977.
3. Alatalo, R.V., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. 1986a. Do females prefer older males in polygynyous bird species? Am. Nat. 127: 241-245.
4. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Björklund, M. 1982. Can song of male birds attract other males? An experiment with the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Bird Behav. 4: 42-45.
5. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Glynn, C. 1986b. Female Pied Flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323: 152-153.
6. Ambuel, B. & Temple, S.A. 1983. Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 64: 1057-1068.
7. Angelstam, P. 1986. Predation on ground-nesting birds' nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47: 365-373.
8. Cody, M.L. (ed.). 1985. Habitat Selection in Birds. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.
9. Fretwell, S.D. & Lucas, H.L., Jr. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 9: 16-36.
10. Gates, J.E. & Gysel, L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871-883.
11. Gezelius, M., Grahn, H., Källander, H. & Karlsson, J. 1984. Habitat-related differences in clutch size of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 21: 209-212.
12. Haartman, L. von. 1956. Territory in the Pied Flycatcher Muscicapa hypoleuca. Ibis 98: 460-475.
13. Hansson, L. Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. (eds). 1995. Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Hildén, O. 1965. Habitat selection of birds: A review. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2: 53-75.
15. Högstedt, G. 1980. Evolution of clutch size in birds: Adaptive variation in relation to territory quality. Science 210: 1148-1150.
16. Högstedt, G. 1981. Effect of additional food on reproductive success in the Magpie (Pica pica). J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 219-229.
17. Hoover, J.P., Brittingham, M.C. & Goodrich, L.J. 1995. Effects of forest patch size on nesting success of Wood Thrushes. Auk 112: 146-155.
18. Hunter, M.L. 1990. Wildlife, Forests, and Forestry: Principles of managing forests for biological diversity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
19. Jokimäki, J. & Huhta, E. 1996. Effects of landscape matrix and habitat structure on a bird community in northern Finland: A multi-scale approach. Ornis Fenn. 73: 97-113.
20. Karlsson, L., K. Persson, & Wallinder, G. 1986. Ålders - Och könsbestämning av Svartvit Flugsnappare Ficedula hypoleuca. Vår Fågelvärld 45: 131-146.
21. Kotliar, N.B. & Wiens, J.A. 1990. Multiple scaling of patchiness and patch structure: A hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253-260.
22. Lack, D. 1954. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Clarendon.
23. Linden, M., Gustafsson, L. & Pärt, T. 1992. Selection on fledgling mass in the Collared Flycatcher and Great Tit. Ecology 73: 336-343.
24. Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R.V. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. London: T&AD Poyser.
25. Magrath, R.D. 1991. Nestling weight and juvenile survival in the Blackbird, Turdus merula. J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 335-351.
26. Martin, T.E. 1987. Food as a limit on breeding birds: A life-history perspective. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 453-487.
27. Martin, T.E. 1988. Process organizing open-nesting bird assemblages: Competition or nest predation? Evol. Ecol. 2: 37-50.
28. McCauley, D.E. 1995. Effects of population dynamics on genetics in mosaic landscapes. In Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. (eds) Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes: 178-193. London: Chapman & Hall.
29. Milinski, M. & Parker, G.A. 1991. Competition for resources. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds) Behaviour Ecology: 137-168. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
30. Møller, A.P. 1988. Nest predation and nest site choice in passerine birds in habitat patches of different size: a study of magpies and blackbirds. Oikos 53: 215-221.
31. Møller, A.P. 1991. Clutch size, nest predation, and distribution of avian unequal competitors in a patchy environment. Ecology 72: 1336-1349.
32. Morris, D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362-369.
33. Morris, D.W. 1992. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol. 6: 412-432.
34. Morris, D.W. 1995. Habitat selection in mosaic landscapes. In Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. (eds) Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes: 110-135, London: Chapman & Hall.
35. Morse, D.H. 1980. Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
36. Orians, G.H. & Wittenberger, J.F. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137: S29-S49.
37. Petit, L.J. & Petit, D.R. 1996. Factors governing habitat selection by Prothonotary Warblers: Field tests of the Fretwell-Lucas models. Ecol. Monogr. 66: 367-387.
38. Probst, J.R. & Hayes, J.P. 1987. Pairing success of Kirtland's Warblers in marginal vs. suitable habitat. Auk 104: 234-241.
39. Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. 1992. Describing Willow Flycatcher habitats: Scale perspectives and gender differences. Condor 94: 720-733.
40. Siikamäki, P. 1995. Habitat quality and reproductive traits in the Pied Flycatcher - An experiment. Ecology 76: 308-312.
41. Steele, B.B. 1992. Habitat selection by breeding Black-throated Blue Warblers at two spatial scales. Ornis Scand. 23: 33-42.
42. Villard, M-A., Martin, P.R. & Drummond, C.G. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and pairing success in the Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus). Auk 110: 759-768.
43. Virkkala, R., Rajasärkkä, A., Väisänen, R.A., Vickholm, M. & Virolainen, E. 1994. Conservation value of nature reserves: Do hole-nesting birds prefer protected forests in southern Finland? Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 173-186.
44. Werner, E.E. & Gilliam, J.F. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 393-425.
45. Wiens, J.A. 1986. Spatial scale and temporal variation in studies of shrubsteppe birds. In Diamond, J. & Case, T.J. (eds) Community Ecology: 154-172. New York: Harper & Row.
46. Wiens, J.A. 1989a. The Ecology of Bird Communities, Vol. 2. Processes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Wiens, J.A. 1989b. Spatial scaling in ecology. Fund. Ecol. 3: 385-397.
48. Wiens, J.A., Rotenberry, J.T. & van Horne, B. 1987. Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: The effects of spatial scale. Oikos 48: 132-147.
49. Wilcove, D.S. 1985. Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66: 1211-1214.
50. Yahner, R.H. & Scott, D.P. 1988. Effects of forest fragmentation on depredation of artificial nests. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 52: 158-161.