Interaction between powdery mildew and barley with mlo5 mildew resistance

Plant Pathology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 252-258

  Lyngkjaer M F ^a,b   Ostergard H ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARLEY POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANCE GENE MLO5; BARLEY; DISEASE RESISTANCE; INFECTIVITY; NEAR ISOGENIC BARLEY LINE; PLANT FUNGUS INTERACTION; PLANT MICROORGANISM INTERACTION; POWDERY MILDEW; VIRULENCE;

BARLEY; DISEASE RESISTANCE; POWDERY MILDEW;

HORDEUM VULGARE;

EID: 2642627684     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1998.00234.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aist JR, Bushnell WR, 1991. Invasion of plants by powdery mildew fungi, and cellular mechanisms of resistance. In: Cole GT, Hoch HC, eds. The Spore and Disease Initiation in Plants and Animals. New York, USA: Plenum Press, 321-45.
2. Aist JR, Randall EG, Bayles CJ, Morrison GH, Chandra S, Israel HW, 1988. Evidence that molecular components of papillae may be involved in mlo resistance to barley powdery mildew. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 33, 17-32.
3. Andersen L, Jørgensen JH, 1992. Mlo aggressiveness of barley powdery mildew. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7, 77-87.
4. Bayles CJ, Ghemawat MS, Aist JR, 1990. Inhibition by 2-deoxy-D-glucose of callose formation, papillae deposition, and resistance to powdery mildew in an mlo barley mutant. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 36, 63-72.
5. Bliss CI, 1967. Statistics in Biology. Statistical Methods for Research in the Natural Sciences, Vol. 1. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
6. Bushnell WR, Bergquist SE, 1975. Aggregation of host cytoplasm and formation of papillae and haustoria in powdery mildew of barley. Phytopathology 65, 310-8.
7. Carver TLW, 1986. Histology of infection by Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei in spring barley lines with various levels of partial resistance. Plant Pathology 35, 232-40.
8. Carver TLW, Robbins MP, Zeyen RJ, 1991. Effects of two PAL inhibitors on the susceptibility and localized autofluorescent host cell responses of oat leaves attacked by Erysiphe graminis DC. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 39, 269-87.
9. Carver TLW, Zeyen RJ, Bushnell WR, 1994a. Inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase increases quantitative susceptibility of barley to powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis DC). Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 44, 261-72.
10. Carver TLW, Zeyen RJ, Robbins MP, Vance CP, Boyles DA, 1994b. Suppression of host cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase increases oat epidermal cell susceptibility to powdery mildew penetration. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 44, 243-59.
11. Clark TA, Zeyen RJ, Smith AG, Carver TLW, Vance CP, 1994, Phenylalanine ammonia lyase mRNA accumulation, enzyme activity and cytoplasmic responses in barley isolines differing at Ml-a and Ml-o loci, attacked by Erysiphe graminis f.sp, Hordei. Physiological And Molecular Plant Pathology 44, 171-85.
12. Ebrahim-Nesbat F, Heitefuss R, Rohringer R, 1986. Ultrastructural and histochemical studies on mildew of barley (Erysiphe graminis DC f.sp. hordei Marchal). IV. Characterization of papillae in fifth leaves exhibiting adult plant resistance. Journal of Phytopathology 117, 289-300.
13. Eschrich W, Currier HB, 1964. Identification of callose by its diachrome and fluorochrome reactions. Stain Technology 39, 303-7.
14. Gold RE, Aist JR, Hazen BE, Stolzenburgh MC, Marshall MR, Israel HW, 1986. Effects of calcium nitrate and chlortetracycline on papilla formation, ml-o resistance and susceptibility of barley to powdery mildew. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 29, 115-29.
15. Jørgensen JH, 1975. Identification of powdery mildew resistant barley mutants and their allelic relationship. In: Anonymous, ed. Barley Genetics III. Proceedings of the Third International Barley Genetics Symposium, Garching 1975. München, Germany: Verlag Karl Thietnig, 446-55.
16. Jørgensen JH, 1984. Durability of the mlo powdery mildew resistance genes in barley. Vorträge für Pflanzenzüchtung 6, 22-31.
17. Jergensen JH, 1992. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63, 141-52.
18. Koga H, Bushnell WR, Zeyen RJ, 1990. Specificity of cell type and timing of events associated with papilla formation and the hypersensitive reaction in leaves of Hordeum vulgare attacked by Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei. Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 2344-52.
19. Lyngkjaer MF, Carver TLW, Zeyen RJ, 1997. Suppression of resistance to Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei conferred by the mlo5 barley powdery mildew resistance gene. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 50, 17-36.
20. Lyngkjær MF, Jensen HP, Østergård H, 1995. A Japanese powdery mildew isolate with exceptional large infection efficiency on mlo resistant barley. Plant Pathology 44, 786-90.
21. Schwarzbach E, 1979. Response to selection for virulence against the ml-o based mildew resistance in barley, nor fitting the gene-for-gene hypothesis. Barley Genetics Newsletter 9, 85-8.
22. Skou JP, 1982. Callose formation responsible for the powdery mildew resistance in barley with genes in the ml-o locus. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 104, 90-5.
23. Skou JP, Jørgensen JH, Lilholt U, 1984. Comparative studies on callose formation in powdery mildew compatible and incompatible barley. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 109, 147-68.
24. Stolzenburgh MC, Aist JR, Israel HW, 1984a. The role of papillae in resistance to powdery mildew conditioned by the ml-o gene in barley. I. Correlative evidence. Physiological Plant Pathology 25, 337-46.
25. Stolzenburgh MC, Aist JR, Israel HW, 1984b. The role of papillae in resistance to powdery mildew conditioned by the ml-o gene in barley. II. Experimental evidence. Physiological Plant Pathology 25, 347-61.
26. Takahashi K, Aist JR, Israel HW, 1985. Distribution of hydrolytic enzymes at barley powdery mildew encounter sites: Implications for resistance associated with papilla formation in a compatible system. Physiological Plant Pathology 27, 167-84.
27. Woher M, Hollrichter K, Salamini F, Schulze-Lefert P, 1993. The mlo resistance alleles to powdery mildew infection in barley trigger a developmentally controlled defence mimic phenotype. Molecular and General Genetics 239, 122-8.
28. Zeyen RJ, Ahlstrand GG, Carver TLW, 1993. X-ray microanalysis of frozen-hydrated, freeze-dried, and critical point dried leaf specimens: determination of soluble and insoluble chemical elements at Erysiphe graminis epidermal cell papilla sites in barley isolines containing Ml-o and ml-o alleles. Canadian Journal of Botany 71, 284-96.
29. Zeyen RJ, Bushnell WR, Carver TLW, Robbins MP, Clark TA, Boyles DA, Vance CP, 1995. Inhibiting phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase suppresses Mla1 (HR) but not mlo5 (non-HR) barley powdery mildew resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 47, 119-40.