Age differences in context integration in memory

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-28

  Smith, Anderson D ^a   Earles, Julie L K ^c   Whiting IV, Wythe L ^a   Park, Denise C ^b   Shaw, Raymond J ^d  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MERRIMACK COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEGRATION; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 2642617017     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.21     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burke, D. M., & Light, L. L. (1981). Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 513-546.
2. Burke, D. M., & Peters, L. (1986). Word associations in old age: Evidence for constancy in semantic encoding during adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 1, 283-292.
3. Cherry, K. E., & Park, D. C. (1989). Age-related differences in three-dimensional spatial memory. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, P16-P22.
4. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409-422). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. Craik, F. I. M., & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory, In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Craik, F. I. M., & Simon, E. (1980). Age differences in memory: The roles of attention and depth of processing. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging : Proceedings of the George Talland Memorial Conference (pp. 95-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Earles, J. K. L., Smith, A. D., & Park, D. C. (1994). Age differences in the effects of facilitating and distracting context on recall. Aging and Cognition, 1, 141-151.
8. Gardner, E., & Monge, R. (1977). Adult age differences in cognitive abilities and educational background. Experimental Aging Research, 3, 337-383.
9. Hulicka, I. M., & Grossman, J. L. (1967). Age group comparisons for the use of mediators in paired-associate learning. Journal of Gerontology, 22, 46-51.
10. Hultsch, D. M. (1974). Learning to learn in adulthood. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 302-308.
11. Jacoby, L. L., Jennings, J. M., & Hay, J. F. (1996). Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled processes: Implications for diagnosis and rehabilitation of memory deficits. In D. J. Herrmann, M. K. Johnson, C. L. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Theory in context (pp. 161-194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
13. Lovelace, E. A., & Cooley, S. (1982). Free association of older adults to single words and conceptually related word triads. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 432-437.
14. Marshall, P. H., Elias, J. W., Webber, S. M., Gist, B. A., Winn, F. J., King, P., & Moore, S. A. (1978). Age differences in verbal mediation: A structural and functional analysis. Experimental Aging Research, 4, 175-193.
15. Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., & Schmitt, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 79-84.
16. Nebes, R. D., & Andrews-Kulis, M. E. (1976). The effect of age on the speed of sentence formation and incidental learning. Experimental Aging Research, 2, 315-332.
17. Nebes, R. D., & Brady, C. B. (1988). Integrity of semantic fields in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 24, 291-299.
18. Park, D. C., Cherry, K. E., Smith, A. D., & Lafronza, V. N. (1990). Effects of distinctive context on memory for objects and their locations in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 250-255.
19. Park, D. C. Puglisi, J. T., Smith, A. D., & Dudley, W. N. (1987). Cue utilization and encoding specificity in picture recognition by older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 423-425.
20. Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Morell, R. W., Puglisi, J. T., & Dudley, W. N. (1990). Effects of contextual integration on recall of pictures by older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, P52-P57.
21. Puglisi, J. T., Park, D. C., & Smith, A. D. (1987). Picture association among old and young adults. Experimental Aging Research, 13, 115-116.
22. Rabinowitz, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly subjects. Psychology and Aging, 4, 259-268.
23. Riegel, K. F. (1968). Changes in psycholinguistic performance with age. In G. A. Talland (Ed.), Human aging and behavior (pp. 239-279). New York: Academic Press.
24. Sharps, M. J., & Gollin, E. S. (1987). Memory for object locations in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 336-341.
25. Shaw, R. J., & Craik, F. I. M. (1989). Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. Psychology and Aging, 4, 131-135.
26. Smith, A. D. (1996). Memory. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed.; pp. 236-250). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Zelinski, E. M., & Light, L. L. (1988). Young and older adults' use of context in spatial memory. Psychology and Aging, 3, 99-101.