Fish communities in artificial pools in the floodplain along the lower reaches of the River Dyje

Folia Zoologica

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 125-134

  Halačka, Karel ^a   Lusk, Stanislav ^a   Lusková, Věra ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Artificial pools; Fish communities; Floodplain; Species richness

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL POOL; FLOODPLAIN; HABITAT; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; RIVER DYJE;

ARTIFICIAL POOL; FISH COMMUNICATION; FLOODPLAIN;

CZECH REPUBLIC, DYJE RIVER;

ABRAMIS BRAMA; BLICCA BJOERKNA; CARASSIUS AURATUS; ESOX LUCIUS; MISGURNUS FOSSILIS; PERCA FLUVIATILIS; RHODEUS SERICEUS; RUTILUS RUTILUS; SCARDINIUS ERYTHROPHTHALMUS; TINCA TINCA;

EID: 2642607891     PISSN: 01397893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BALON, E.K., 1966: On the fish populations of the Danubian back waters. Biológia , 21 (12): 865-884 (in Slovak, with summaries in German and Russian).
2. BALON, E.K., 1967: Evolution of the Danube fish fauna, its recent state and an attempt for the prognosis of further changes after the hydro-electric power building. Biologické práce SAV Bratislava, 13/1: 3-121 (in Slovak, with summaries in English and German).
3. BALON, E.K., 1981: Additions and amendments to the classification of reproductive styles in fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish., 6 (3/4): 377-389.
4. COPP, G.H., 1989: The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystems. Environ. Biol.Fish.,26: 1-27.
5. FLAJŠHANS, M. LINHART, O. & KVASNIČKA, P., 1995: Spontaneous triploidy in tench, Tinca tinca (Linnaeus, 1758). Pol.Arch. Hydrobiol., 42 (1-2): 147-148.
6. HALYK, L.C. & BALON, E.K., 1983: Structure and ecological production of the fish taxone of a small floodplain system. Can. J. Zool. 61: 2446-2464.
7. HOLČIK, J. (ed.), 1989: The freshwater fishes of Europe 1/II. General introduction to fishes. Acipenseriformes. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
8. HOLČÍK, J., 1996: Vanishing freshwater fish species of Slovakia. In: Kirchhofer, A. & Hefti, D. (eds.), Conservation of endangered freshwater fish in Europe. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel-Boston-Berlin : 79-88.
9. HOLČÍK, J. & BASTL, I., 1973: Hlavné faktory limitujúce ichtyomasu v periodických jezierkach (The main factors limiting level of the ichthyomass in periodic lakes). In: Sb. Symposium k 75.nar: prof. B. Kostomarova, VŠZ Brno: 225-236 (in Slovak, with a summary in English).
10. HOLČIK, J., BASTL, I., ERTL, M. & VRANOVSKÝ, M., 1981: Hydrobiology and ichthyology of the Czechoslovak Danube in relation to predicted changes after the construction of the Gabčikovo-Nagymaros river barrage system. Práce Lab.Rybár. Hydrobiol., Bratislava, 3: 19-158.
11. KUX, Z., 1957: Contribution to the knowledge of the fish fauna of the Danube drainage area in the ČSR. Čas.Moravského musea. v.přir, 42: 67-84 (in Czech, with a summary in German).
12. LELEK, A., 1989: The Rhine River and some of its tributaries under human impacy in the last two centuries. In: Dodge, D. P. (ed.), Proceedings of the international large river symposium. Can.Spec.Publ.Fish Aquat.Sc., 106: 469-487.
13. LELEK, A., LIBOSVÁRSKÝ, J. & LUCKÝ, Z., 1959: Ichthological notes on the Dyje River back waters. Zool.listy, 8(1): 20-12 (in Czech, with a summary in German).
14. LIBOSVÁRSKÝ, J., 1963: Age and growth of the crucian carp, Carassius carassius (L.) in some Czechoslovakian waters. Zool. listy, 12 (3): 239-258 (in Czech, with a summary in English).
15. LUCKÝ, Z., 1955: Conditions for the occurrence and development of fishes in the alluvium of the River Dyje. Čas.Nár.musea. odd.př., 74(1): 77-82 (in Czech).
16. LUSK, S., 1981: Development of the fish population in the Mušov reservoir in the first year after filling. Folia Zool., 30: 249-261.
17. LUSK, S., 1986: The areas of occurrence of giebel carp (Carassius auratus) under Czechoslovak conditions. Živoč.Výr., 31(10): 945-951 (in Czech, with summaries in English, German and Russian).
18. LUSK, S., HALAČKA, K., LUSKOVÁ, V. & PRAŽÁK, O., 1996: Fish assemblages of the "Soutok" area in Southern Moravia, Czech Republic. Acta Universiratis Carolinae, Biologica, 40(1-2): 147-155.
19. MILLS, L.S, SOULE, M.E. & DOAK, D.K., 1993: The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bio-Science, 43 (4): 219-224.
20. OLIVA, O., 1955: The composition of fish populations in three natural ponds in the Elbe River region. Univ.Carol.,Biol., 1(1): 61-75 (in Czech, with summaries in English and Russian).
21. OLIVA, O., 1960: Further contribution to the fish population composition in the Elbe River region. Věst. Čs.spol.zool., 24 (1): 42-49 (in Czech, with a summary in English).
22. RÁB, P., LUSK, S., RÁBOVÁ, M., LUSKOVÁ, V., HALAČKA, K., ŠLECHTA, V. & ŠLECHTOVA, V., 1996: Species of the genus Cobitis in the Czech Republic. Final Report, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR Liběchov, Institute of Landscape Ecology AS CR Brno, pp. 41 (in Czech).