Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: Development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-16

  Lærum, Hallvard ^a   Faxvaag, Arild ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEM; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2642580981     PISSN: 14726947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Heathfield HA, Pitty D, Hanka R:Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ 1998, 316:1959-1961.
2. Heathfield HA, Felton D, Clamp S: Evaluation of Electronic Patient and Health Record Projects. Volume 2001-IA-533. Edited by: HeathfieldHA.England, ERDIP Programme, NHS Information Authority; 2002:1-80.
3. Gennip E.M.S.J.van, Talmon JL: Assessment and evaluation of information technologies in medicine / edited by E. M. S. J. van Gennip and J. L. Talmon Edited by: GennipEMSJvan and TalmonJL.Amsterdam., IOS Press.; 1995.
4. Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP: Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998, 5:164-176.
5. Wirth P, Kahn L, Perkoff GT: Comparability of two methods of time and motion study used in a clinical setting: work sampling and continuous observation. Med Care 1977, 15:953-960.
6. Jacoby I, Kindig D: Task analysis in National Health Service Corps field stations: a methodological evaluation. Med Care 1975, 13:308-317.
7. Burkle T, Ammenwerth E, Prokosch HU, Dudeck J: Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot? J Eval Clin Pract 2001, 7:373-385.
8. Lærum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A: Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ 2001, 323:1344-1348.
9. Fink Arlene: The Survey kit / series editor Arlene Fink Edited by: FinkArlene. Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage Publications.; 1995.
10. Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK: A Guide to task analysis Edited by: KirwanBarry and Ainsworth LK. London., Taylor & Francis.; 1992.
11. Gorman PN: Information Needs of Physicians. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995, 46:729-736.
12. Lærum H, Karlsen TH, Faxvaag A: Impacts of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, M1337:XX-YY.
13. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G: The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction - theoretical and Methodological issues. MIS Quarterly 1991, 15:5-10.
14. Aydin CE, Rice RE: Social worlds, individual-differences, and implementation - predicting attitudes toward a medical information-system. Information & Management 1991, 20:119-136.
15. Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ: Evaluating Health Care Information Systems SAGE; 1994.
16. Sprangers M, Cull A: Guidelines for moduel development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute; 1992.
17. Lewis RJ: Reliability and Validity: Meaning and Measurement. Ambulatory Pediatric Association 1999.
18. Keller SD, Ware J.E.,Jr., Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S: Testing the equivalence of translations of widely used response choice labels: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:933-944.
19. Heggland J: OntoLog. Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, NTNU NTNU; 2003.
20. Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fiskio J: Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system. Proc AMIA Symp Bethesda, Maryland USA, American Medical Informatics Association; 1999:400-404.
21. Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW: Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996, 3:42-55.
22. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G: The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988, 12:259-274.
23. Massaro TA: Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med 1993, 68:20-25.
24. Mendenhall RC, Lloyd JS, Repicky PA, Monson JR, Girard RA, Abrahamson S: A national study of medical and surgical specialties. II. Description of the survey instrument. JAMA 1978, 240:1160-1168.
25. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL: Cognitive computer-based video analysis: its application in assessing the usability of medical systems. Medinfo 1995, 8 Pt 2:1566-1569.
26. Brender J: Methodological and methodical perils and pitfalls within assessment studies performed on IT-based solutions in healthcare. Virtual Centre for Health Informatics, Aalborg University; 2002.
27. Nelson EC, Jacobs AR, Breer PE: A study of the validity of the task inventory method of job analysis. Med Care 1975, 13:104-113.
28. Rossi Peter H., Wright James D., Anderson Andy B.: Handbook of survey research Orlando, Academic Press; 1983.
29. Joshi K, Bostrom RP, Perkins WC: Some new factors influencing user information satisfaction: implications for systems professionals. Calgary, Canada, Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference; 1986:27-42.
30. Doll WJ, Xia W, Torkzadeh G: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly 1994:453-461.
31. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL: Development of an Instrument Measuring User Satisfaction of the Human-Computer Interface. NY Association for Computing Machinery; 1988:213-218.
32. Kerlinger Fred N.: Foundations of behavioral research : educational and psychological inquiry London, Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1969.
33. Friedman Charles P., Wyatt JC: Evaluation methods in medical informatics New York, Springer; 1997.