Perceptions of desirable tooth color among parents, dentists and children

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 135, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 595-604

  Shulman, Jay D ^b   Maupomé, Gerardo ^c   Clark, D Christopher ^a   Levy, Steven M ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIST; ENAMEL; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FLUORIDATION; FLUOROSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PARENT; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; SATISFACTION; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; TOOTH COLOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2642569916     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0247     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999;14(4):291-5.
2. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):311-24.
3. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17(4):299-304.
4. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4(3):146-52.
5. Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. JADA 1980;100(3):345-52.
6. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(3):246-54.
7. Wagner IV, Carlsson GE, Ekstrand K, Odman P, Schneider N. A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance of dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation. J Esthet Dent 1996;8(5):199-205.
8. Pietilä T, Pietilä I. Parents' views on their own child's dentition compared with an orthodontist's assessment. Eur J Orthod 1994;16(4):309-16.
9. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups: a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2000;22(5):509-18.
10. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987;9(4):314-8.
11. McKnight CB, Levy SM, Cooper SE, Jakobsen JR, Warren JJ. A pilot study of dental students' esthetic perceptions of computer-generated mild dental fluorosis compared to other conditions. J Public Health Dent 1999;59(1):18-23.
12. Ripa LW. A critique of topical fluoride methods (dentifrices, mouth rinses, operator-, and self-applied gels) in an era of decreased caries and increased fluorosis prevalence. J Public Health Dent 1991;51(1):23-41.
13. Ellwood R, O'Mullane D, Clarkson J, Driscoll W. A comparison of information recorded using the Thylstrup Fejerskov index, tooth surface index of fluorosis and developmental defects of enamel index. Int Dent J 1994;44(6):628-36.
14. Lund AE. Have you ever diagnosed fluorosis in one of your pediatric patients, and do you regard fluorosis as a health issue? JADA 1999;130(8):1163.
15. Riordan PJ. Perceptions of dental fluorosis. J Dent Res 1993;72:1268-74.
16. McKnight CB, Levy SM, Cooper SE, Jakobsen JR. A pilot study of esthetic perceptions of dental fluorosis versus other selected dental conditions. ASDC J Dent Child 1998;65(4):233-8.
17. Ellwood RP, O'Mullane D. Enamel opacities and dental esthetics. J Public Health Dent 1995;55:171-6.
18. Clark DC, Berkowitz J. The relationship between the number of sound, decayed, and filled permanent tooth surfaces and the number of sealed surfaces in children and adolescents. J Public Health Dent 1997;57(3):171-5.
19. Woodward GL, Main PA, Leake JL. Clinical determinants of a parent's satisfaction with the appearance of a child's teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:416-8.
20. Clark DC. Evaluation of aesthetics for the different classifications of the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23:80-3.
21. Lalumandier JA, Rozier RG. Parents' satisfaction with children's tooth color: fluorosis as a contributing factor. JADA 1998;129(7):1000-6.
22. Riordan PJ. Specialist clinicians' perceptions of dental fluorosis. ASDC J Dent Child 1993;60:315-20.
23. Clark DC, Hann HJ, Williamson MF, Berkowitz J. Aesthetic concerns of children and parents in relation to different classifications of the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:360-4.
24. Hawley GM, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. Dental caries, fluorosis and the cosmetic implications of different TF scores in 14-year-old adolescents. Community Dent Health 1996;13(4):189-92.
25. Stephen KW, McCall DR, Gilmour WH. Incisor enamel mottling prevalence in child cohorts which had not taken fluoride supplements from 0-12 years of age. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1999;87:595-605.
26. Clark DC, Berkowitz J. The influence of various fluoride exposures on the prevalence of esthetic problems resulting from dental fluorosis. J Public Health Dent 1997;57(3):144-9.
27. Eriksen HM, Nordbo H. Extrinsic discoloration of teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1978;5:229-36.
28. Dayan D, Heifferman A, Gorski M, Begleiter A. Tooth discoloration: extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Quintessence Int 1983;14:195-9.
29. Ogunyinka A. Enamel staining and hypoplasia due to multiple causes in a Nigerian adolescent: report of a case. Afr J Med Med Sci 1998;27:247-50.
30. Chandra S., Chawla TN. Clinical evaluation of the sandpaper disk method for removing fluorosis stains from the teeth. JADA 1975;90:1273-6.
31. Faunce F. Management of discolored teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27(4):657-70.
32. Clark DC. Appropriate uses of fluorides for children: guidelines from the Canadian Workshop on the Evaluation of Current Recommendations Concerning Fluorides. CMAJ 1993;149(12):1787-93.
33. Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:151-62.
34. Maupomé G, Clark DC, Levy SM, Berkowitz J. Patterns of dental caries following the cessation of water fluoridation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29(1):37-47.
35. Maupomé G, Shulman, JD, Clark DC, Levy SM, Berkowitz J. Tooth-surface progression and reversal changes in fluoridated and no-longer-fluoridated communities over a three-year period. Caries Res 2001;35(2):95-105.
36. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:315-28.
37. Summers CJ, Gooch BF, Marianos DW, Malvitz DM, Bond WW. Practical infection control in oral health surveys and screenings. JADA 1994;125(9):1213-7.
38. Khattree R, Naik DN. Applied multivariate statistics with SAS software. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute; 1995.
39. Sciamanna CN, Hoch JS, Duke GC, Fogle MN, Ford DE. Comparison of five measures of motivation to quit smoking among a sample of hospitalized smokers. J Gen Int Med 2000;15(1):16-23.
40. Levy SM, Warren JJ, Jakobsen JR. Follow-up study on dental students' esthetic perceptions of mild dental fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30(1):24-8.
41. Albino JE, Tedesco LA, Conny DJ. Patient perceptions of dental-facial esthetics: shared concerns in orthodontics and prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:9-13.