Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type: A preliminary study

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 275-281

  Mathieson, Ian ^a   Upton, Dominic ^a   Prior, Trevor D ^b  

^a CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b St Leonard's   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCANEUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; SCAPHOID BONE; SUBTALAR JOINT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2642560166     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/0940275     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. MATHIESON I, UPTON D, BIRCHENOUGH A: Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamic footprints. The Foot 9: 145, 1999.
2. MESSIER SP, PITTALA KA: Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: 501, 1988.
3. BECKETT ME, MASSIE DL, BOWERS KD, ET AL: Incidence of hyperpronation in the ACL injured knee: a clinical perspective. J Athlet Train 27: 58, 1992.
4. COWAN DN, JONES BH, ROBINSON JR: Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med 2: 773, 1993.
5. WOODFORD-ROGERS B, CYPHERT L, DENEGAR CR: Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in high school and college athletes. J Athlet Train 29: 343, 1994.
6. BUSSEUIL C, FREYCHAT P, GUEDJ EB, ET AL: Rearfoot-forefoot orientation and traumatic risk for runners. Foot Ankle Int 19: 32, 1998.
7. FREYCHAT P, BELLI A, CARRET JP, ET AL: Relationship between rearfoot and forefoot orientation and ground reaction forces during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 225, 1996.
8. DUFFEY MJ, MARTIN DF, CANNON DW, ET AL: Etiologic factors associated with anterior knee pain in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1825, 2000.
9. MCCRORY JL, MARTIN DF, LOWERY RB, ET AL: Etiologic factors associated with Achilles tendinitis in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 1374, 1999.
10. ILAHI OA, KOHL HW: Lower extremity morphology and alignment and risk of overuse injury. Clin J Sport Med 8: 38, 1998.
11. WEN DY, PUFFER JC, SCHMALZRIED TP: Lower extremity alignment and risk of overuse injuries in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29: 1291, 1997.
12. COWAN DN, JONES BH, FRYKMAN PN, ET AL: Lower extremity morphology and risk of overuse injury among male infantry trainees. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 945, 1996.
13. WILLIAMS DS, MCCLAY IS: Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther 80: 864, 2000.
14. REDMOND A, BURNS J, OUVRIER RA, ET AL: An initial appraisal of the validity of a criterion based, observational clinical rating system for foot posture: Static and Dynamic Classification of the Foot Meeting 2001, Annapolis, MD. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31: 160, 2001.
15. COWAN DN, ROBINSON JR, JONES BH, ET AL: Consistency of visual assessment of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle Int 15: 213, 1994.
16. MCCLAY IS, BRAY J: The subtalar angle: a proposed measure of rearfoot structure. Foot Ankle Int 17: 499, 1996.
17. KALEN V, BRECHNER A: Relationship between adolescent bunions and flatfeet. Foot Ankle Int 8: 331, 1988.
18. PRICHASUK S, SUBHADRABANDHU T: The relationship of pes planus and calcaneal spur to plantar heel pain. Clin Orthop 306: 192, 1994.
19. KERNOZEK TW, RICARD MD: Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71: 988, 1990.
20. SALTZMAN CL, NAWOCZENSKI DA, KYLE DT: Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 45, 1995.
21. NACHBAUER W, NIGG BM: Effects of arch height, of the foot on ground reaction forces in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 1264, 1992.
22. NIGG BM, COLE GK, NACHBAUER W: Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech 26: 909, 1993.
23. OGON M, ALEKSIEV AR, POPE MH, ET AL: Does arch height affect impact loading at the lower back level in running? Foot Ankle Int 20: 263, 1999.
24. SIMKIN A, LEICHTER I: Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot: a biomechanical model. Med Biol Eng Comp 28: 149, 1990.
25. ROSE GK: "Pes Planus," in Disorders of the Foot and Ankle: Medical and Surgical Management, 2nd Ed, ed by MH Jahss, p 892, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1991.
26. CAVANAGH PR, RODGERS MM: The Arch Index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 20: 547, 1987.
27. QAMRA SR, DEODHAR SD, JIT I: Podographical and metrical study for pes planus in a northwestern Indian population. Hum Biol 52: 435, 1980.
28. FORRIOL F, PASCUAL J: Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle Int 11: 101, 1990.
29. STAHELI LT, CHEW DE, CORBETT M: The longitudinal arch: a survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69: 426, 1987.
30. ANTHONY RJ: The Manufacture and Use of the Functional Foot Orthosis, Karger, London, 1991.
31. PHILPS JW: The Functional Foot Orthoses, 2nd Ed, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1995.
32. WRIGHT DG, DESAI SM, HENDERSON WH: Action of the subtalar and ankle-joint complex during the stance phase of walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46: 361, 1964.
33. MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW: Relationship between neutral subtalar joint position and pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle Int 15: 141, 1994.
34. PIERRYNOWSKI MR, SMITH SB: Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position. Foot Ankle Int 17: 406, 1996.
35. MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW: Relationship between 3 static angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 23: 370, 1996.
36. TORBURN L, PERRY J, GRONLEY JK: Assessment of rearfoot motion: passive positioning, one-legged standing, gait. Foot Ankle Int 19: 688, 1998.
37. NESTER CJ: Rearfoot complex: a review of its interdependent components, axis orientation and functional model. The Foot 7: 86, 1997.
38. ROOT ML, ORIEN W, WEED JH: Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot, Clinical Biomechanics Corp, Los Angeles, 1977.
39. HUSON A: "Functional Anatomy of the Foot," in Disorders of the Foot and Ankle: Medical and Surgical Management, 2nd Ed, ed by MH Jahss, p 409, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1991.
40. ELFTMAN H: The transverse tarsal joint and its control. Clin Orthop 16: 41, 1960.
41. INMAN VT, RALSTON HJ, TODD F: "Human Locomotion," in Human Walking, 2nd Ed, ed by J Rose, J Gamble, p 1, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1994.
42. MANTER JT: Movements of the transverse tarsal joints. Anat Rec 80: 397, 1941.
43. SELL KE, VERITY TM, WORRELL TW, ET AL: Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19: 162, 1994.
44. BOWLING A: Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services, Open University Press, Philadelphia, 1997.
45. DALY LE, BOURKE GJ: Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics, 5th Ed, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2000.
46. PEARCE TJ, BUCKLEY RE: Subtalar joint movement: clinical and computed tomography scan correlation. Foot Ankle Int 20: 428, 1999.
47. ROOT ML, ORIEN W, WEED JH, ET AL: Biomechanical Examination of the Foot, Vol 1, Clinical Biomechanics Corp, Los Angeles, 1971.
48. CORNWALL MW, MCPOIL TG: Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking. Foot Ankle Int 20: 507, 1999.
49. CAVANAGH PR, MORAG E, BOULTON AJM, ET AL: The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 30: 243, 1997.
50. SALTZMAN CL, NAWOCZENSKI DA, TALBOT KD: Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 45, 1995.
51. BRODY DM: Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am 13: 541, 1982.
52. MUELLER MJ, HOST JV, NORTON BJ: Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. JAPMA 83: 198, 1993.
53. PICCIANO AM, ROWLANDS MS, WORRELL T: Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 18: 553, 1993.
54. KEENAN A: A clinician's guide to the practical implications of the recent controversy of foot function. Australas J Podiatr Med 31: 87, 1997.