|
|
Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 233-236
|
|
Ethics roundtable
a,b,c
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BRONCHODILATING AGENT;
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
DECISION MAKING;
DISEASE COURSE;
EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
NURSING;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
REVIEW;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
CASE REPORT;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICS;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
INTENSIVE CARE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HUMANS;
INTENSIVE CARE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
VALUE OF LIFE;
|
|
EID: 2642552869
PISSN: 10499091
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/104990910402100315 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
