Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 333-336

  Erdoĝan, Fazli ^a   Demirel, A ^a   Polat, O ^a  

^a ATATURK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CELL TYPE; CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 2642552183     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.00008.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rosai J. Ackerman's Surgical Pathology, 8th edn. A Times Mirror Company: St Louis, 1996: 1145-63.
2. Gelb AB. Renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80(5): 981-5.
3. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1969; 101: 297-301.
4. Guinian P, Sobin LH, Algaba F et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80(5): 992-3.
5. Skinner DG, Colvin RB, Vermillon CD et al. Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathological study of 309 cases. Cancer 1971; 28: 1165-77.
6. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6(7): 655-63.
7. Munichor M, Lichtig C, Tzin G et al. Prognostic significance of granular cell content in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1992; 22: 204-8.
8. Störkel S, Eble JN, Adlakha K et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80(5): 987-9.
9. Giberti C, Oneto F, Martorana G et al. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors on series of 328 cases. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 40-8.
10. Goldstein NS. The current state of renal cell carcinoma grading. Cancer 1997; 80 (5): 977-80.
11. Delahunt B, Nacey JN. Renal cell carcinoma. II. Histological indicators of prognosis. Pathology 1987; 19: 258-63.
12. Thoenes W, Störkel S, Rumpelt HJ. Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas, and carcinomas): the basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics. Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181: 125-43.
13. Störkel S, Thoenes W, Jacobi GH et al. Prognostic parameters in renal cell carcinoma: a new approach. Eur Urol 1989; 16: 416-22.
14. Medeiros LJ, Gelb AB, Weiss LM. Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases. Cancer 1988; 61: 1639-51.
15. Baltaci S, Orhan D, Soyupek S et al. Influence of tumor stage, size, grade, vascular involvement, histological cell type and histological pattern on multifocality of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2000; 164: 36-9.
16. Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, Fremont M et al. Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1995; 76(12): 2543-9.
17. Yorukoglu K, Aktas S, Guler C et al. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998; 52(1): 44-7.
18. Giberti C, Oneto F, Martorana G et al. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors on a series of 328 cases. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 40-8.
19. Carducci MA, Piantadosi S, Pound CR et al. Nuclear morphometry adds significant prognostic information to stage and grade for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1999; 53(1): 44-9.