Single versus three piece acrylic IOLs

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 727-728

  Chang, D F ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CAPSULOTOMY; CATARACT; CELL MIGRATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; EPITHELIUM CELL; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 2642550787     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.040063     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Leaming DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-2002 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1412-20.
2. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. Biocompatibilily of poly(methylmethacrylate), silicone, and AcrySof intraocular lenses: randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:361-6.
3. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. Surface cytologic features on intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthamol 1999;117:872-8.
4. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F. Quantitative comparison of posterior capsule opacification after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1579-82.
5. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsule opacification three years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:49-55.
6. Olson RJ. Is there truly a clinical difference in intraocular lenses available today? Comp Ophthalmol Update 2000;1:19-28.
7. Linnola RJ, Sund M, Ylonen R, et al. Adhesion of soluble fibronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1486-91.
8. Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK, et al. Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 2: explanted intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1807-18.
9. Nishi O, Nishi K. Preventing posterior capsule opacification by creating a discontinuous sharp bend in the capsule. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:521-6.
10. Nishi O, Nishi K, Akura J, et al. Effect of round-edged acrylic intraocular lenses on preventing posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:608-13.
11. Nishi O, Nishi K, Wickstrom K. Preventing lens epithelial cell migration using intraocular lenses with sharp rectangular optic edges. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1543-9.
12. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, et al. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:50-61.
13. Auffarth GU, Golescu A, Becker KA, et al. Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2003;110:772-80.
14. Buehl W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Effect of an acrylic intraocular lens with a sharp posterior optic edge on posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1105-11.
15. Holladay JT, Lang A, Portney V. Analysis of edge glare phenomena in intraocular lens edge designs. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:748-52.
16. Tester R, Poce NL, Samore M, et al. Dysphotopsia in phakic and pseudophakic patients: incidence and relation to intraocular lens type (2). J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:810-16.
17. Farbowitz MA, Zabriskie NA, Crandoll AS, et al. Visual complaints associated with the AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1339-45.
18. Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1346-55.
19. Erie JC, Bandhauer MH, McLaren JW. Analysis of postoperative glare and intraocular lens design. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:614-21.
20. Vargas LG, Peng Q, Apple DJ, et al. Evaluation of 3 modern single-piece foldable intraocular lenses: clinicopathological study of posterior capsule opacification in a rabbit model. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1241-50.
21. Schmidbauer JM, Escobar-Gomez M, Apple DJ, et al. Effect of haptic angulation on posterior capsule opacification in modern foldable lenses with a square, truncated optic edge. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1251-5.
22. Nishi O, Nishi K. Effect of the optic size of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:348-353.
23. Nishi O, Nishi K, Akura J. Speed of capsular bend formation at the optic edge of acrylic, silicone, and paly(methyl methacrylate) lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:431-437.
24. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, et al. Elapsed time for capsular opposition to intraocular lens after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1427-31.
25. Wallin TR, Hinckley M, Nilson C, et al. A clinical comparison of single-piece and three-piece truncated hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:614-19.
26. Da Reitz Pereira C, Rauser ME, LaBree L. Anterior capsule contraction syndrome with the AcrySof SA60AT acrylic lens. Anaheim, California. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, 2003.
27. Davison JA. Capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:582-9.
28. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Area reduction in the anterior capsule opening in eyes of diabetes mellitus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:1105-10.
29. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, et al. Anterior capsule contraction and intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1429-32.