Monitoring organ donor rates: A predictive model based on routinely available data in France applied to the year 2002

Public Health

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 354-359

  Poinard, C ^a   Baudrin, L ^a   Chalem, Y ^a   Tuppin, Philippe ^a   Golmard, J L ^b  

^a Etablissement Francais des Greffes   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Managing care; Organ donor rates; Organ procurement

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; FRANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; ORGAN DONOR; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT MONITORING; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME;

FRANCE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 2642550629     PISSN: 00333506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Etablissement français des Greffes (EfG) Rapport d'Activité et Bilan des Activités de Prélèvement et de Greffe en France 2000 2000 Etablissement français des Greffes Paris
2. Organizacion Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT) Memoria de la Actividad de Donacion y Trasplante 2001 Organizacion Nacional de Trasplantes Madrid
3. Ojo A.O. Wolfe R.A. Leichtman A.B. Dickinson D.M. Port F.K. Young E.W. A practical approach to evaluate the potential donor pool and trends in cadaveric kidney donation Transplantation. 67 1999 548-556
4. Christiansen C.L. Gortmaker S.L. Williams J.M. et al. A method for estimating solid organ donor potential by organ procurement region Am J Public Health 88 1998 1645-1650
5. SAS/STAT Software Version 8.2. The Procedure. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1999-2000.
6. Allison P.D. Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application 1999 SAS Institute Cary, NC
7. Matesanz R. Miranda B. Evolution of the characteristics of transplant donors in Spain Nephrol Dial Transplant 10 Suppl 6 1995 100-104
8. La Sécurité Routière en France: Bilan de l'Année 2000.
9. Sécurité Routière. Paris: la Documentation Française, 2001.
10. Rosel J. Frutos M.A. Blanca M.J. Ruiz P. Discriminant variables between donors and nondonors investigation J Transpl Coord 9 1999 50-53
11. Bires M.H. Comparison of consent rates between hospital-based designed requestors and procurement coordinators J Transpl Coord 9 1999 177-180
12. Evanisko M.J. Beasley C.L. Brighan L.E. et al. Readiness of critical care physicians and nurses to handle requests for organ donation Am J Crit Care 7 1998 4-12
13. Guadagnoli E. McNamara P. Evanisko M.J. Beasley C. Callender C.O. Poretsky A. The influence of race on approaching families for organ donation and their decision to donate Am J Public Health 89 1999 244-247
14. Gortmaker S.L. Beasley C.L. Sheehy E. et al. Improving the request process to increase family consent for organ donation J Transpl Coord 8 1998 210-217
15. Frezza E. Krefski L. Valenziano C. Factors influencing the potential organ donation: a 6-yr experience of the New Jersey organ and tissue sharing network Clin Transpl 13 1999 231-240
16. Matesanz R. Miranda B. Fernandez Lucas M. Contribution of nontransplant and small hospitals to organ procurement in Spain Transplant Proc 28 1996 232-233
17. Gortmaker S.L. Beasley C.L. Brigham L.E. et al. Organ donor potential and performance: size and nature of the organ donor shortfall Crit Care Med 24 1996 432-439
18. Cuende Melero N. Canon Campos J.F. Miranda Serrano B. Alonso Gil M. The organ donation process: a program for its evaluation and improvement Organs Tissues 2 2002 109-118