The economic impact of the ACFM catch options for the Danish North Sea herring and industrial fisheries in 1999

Fisheries Research

Volumn 68, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 21-35

  Christensen, Steen ^a   Lassen, Hans ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ICES ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

ACFM options; Bio economic model; Effort allocation; Herring fishery; Industrial fishery; Net revenue

Indexed keywords

CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT; ECONOMIC IMPACT; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; QUOTA SYSTEM;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; NORTH SEA;

CLUPEA HARENGUS;

EID: 2642545916     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andersen, P., Sutinen, J.G., 2003. Financing fishery management: principles and economic implications. In: Shrank, W., Arnason, R., Hannesson, R. (Eds.), The Cost of Fishery Management. Ashgate, Aldershot, GB.
2. Bjørndal T. Production economics and optimal stock size in a north Atlantic fishery. Scand. J. Econ. 89:1987;145-164
3. Bjørndal T. The optimal management of North Sea herring. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 15:1988;9-29
4. Bjørndal T. Production in a schooling fishery: the case of the North Sea herring fishery. Land Econ. 65:1989;49-56
5. Bjørndal, T., Gordon, D.V., Kaitala, V., Lindroos, M., 2000. International management strategies for a migratory fish stock: a bio-economic simulation model of the Norwegian spring-spawning herring fishery. International Relations and the Common Fisheries Policy. CEMARE Misc. Publ., no. 49, pp. 209-237. IB: ISBN 1861372183.
6. Budsjettnemda for fiskenæringen, 1996. Bergen, Norway. ISSN 0801-504.
7. Gulland, J.A., 1981. An overview of applications of operations research in fishery management. In: Haley, K.B. (Ed.), Applied Operations Research in Fishing. Plenum Press, New York. IBSN 0-306-40634-9.
8. Hanna, S., Folke, C., Mäler, K.-G., 1995. Property rights and environmental resources. In: Hanna, S., Munasinghe, M. (Eds.), Property Right and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues. The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 15-29.
9. Harley S.J., Myers R.A., Dunn A. Is catch-per-unit effort proportional to abundance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58:2001;1760-1772
10. Hilborn, R., Walters, C.J., 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Chapman & Hall, New York.
11. Hønneland, G.B., 1998. Enforcement and legitimacy in the Barents Sea fisheries. In: Symes, D. (Ed.), Northern Waters: Management Issues and Practice. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp. 79-89.
12. ICES, 1999. Report of the Advisory Committee for Fisheries Management. Cooperative Research Report No. 229. Copenhagen, Denmark.
13. Lewy P. Sampling methods and errors in the Danish North Sea industrial fisheries. DANA. 11(1):1995;39-64
14. Nielsen, M., in press. Market integration and demand: analysis of the European herring market. In: Kalaydjian, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the XVth Annual Conference in the European Association of Fisheries Economists, Brest. IFREMER, Centre de Brest, Plouzané, France, May 14-16, 2003.
15. Wallis, P., Flaaten, O., 2003. Fisheries management costs: concepts and studies. In: Shrank, W., Arnason, R., Hannesson, R. (Eds.), The Cost of Fishery Management. Ashgate, Aldershot, GB.