The relationship between measures of patient satisfaction and enablement and professional assessments of consultation competence

Medical Teacher

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 223-228

  McKinley, R K ^a   Fraser, R C ^a   Baker, R H ^a   Riley, R D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; ROC CURVE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 2642539517     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001683186     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baker, R. (1990) Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice, British Journal of General Practice, 40, pp. 487-490.
2. Baker, R. & Streatfield, J. (1995) What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction, British Journal of General Practice, 45, pp. 654-659.
3. Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations, Part 1: Correlation within subjects, British Medical Journal, 310(6977), p. 446.
4. Hastings, A.M., Fraser, R.C. & Mckinley, R.K. (2000) Student perceptions of a new integrated course in clinical methods for medical undergraduates, Medical Education, 34, pp. 101-107.
5. Howie, J.G., Heaney, D.J., Maxwell, M., Walker, J.J., Freeman, G.K. & Rai, H. (1999) Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey, British Medical Journal, 319(7212 ), pp. 738-743.
6. Mason, R., Zouita, L. & Ayers, B. (2001) Assessing clinical competence and revalidation of clinicians: results from pilot, study using portfolio and 360 degrees questionnaire, British Medical Journal, 322(7302), p. 1601.
7. Mckinley, R.K, Fraser, R.C. & Bayer, R. (2001) Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians, British Medical Journal, 322, pp. 712-715.
8. Mckinley, R.K., Fraser, R.C., Van Der Vleuten, C. & Hastings, A.M. (2000) Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the Leicester Assessment Package, Medical Education, 34, pp. 573-579.
9. Metz, C.E. (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 8, pp. 283-298.
10. Ramsey, P.G., & Wenrich, M.D., (1999) Use of professional associate ratings to assess the performance of practicing physicians: past, present, future, Advances in Health Science Education, 4(1), pp. 49-66.
11. Ramsey, P.G., Wenrich, M.D., Carline, J.D., Inui, T.S., Larson, E.B. & Logerfo, J.P. (1993) Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance, Journal of the American Medical Association, 269(13), pp. 1655-1660.
12. Southgate, L. & Pringle, M. (1999) Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice, British Medical Journal, 319, pp. 1180-1183.
13. Stewart, M.A. (1995) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes - a review, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152, pp. 1423-1433.
14. Wilkinson, T.J. & Fontaine, S. (2002) Patients' global ratings of student competence: unreliable contamination or gold standard?, Medical Education, 36(12), pp. 1117-1121.
15. Woolliscroft, J.O., Howell, J.D., Patel, B.P. & Swanson, D.B. (1994) Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses, Academic Medicine, 69(3), pp. 216-224.