Privacy and technology: Reconsidering a crucial public policy debate in the post-September 11 era

Public Administration Review

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-269

  Nelson, Lisa ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642534237     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00370.x     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Allen, Anita L. 1999 Coercing Privacy. William and Mary Law Review 40: 723, 754-55.
2. Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania. 2003. Americans and Online Privacy: The System is Broken. http://www. annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org.
3. Cate, Fred H., and Robert Litan. 2002. Constitutional Issues in Information Privacy. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 9(1): 35-63.
4. Cohen, Julie. 2000. Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object Stanford Law Review 52(1373) 1424-28.
5. Cohen, Julie. 2003. DRM and Privacy. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18(2): 575-88.
6. Froomkin, A. Michael. 1996. Flood Control on the Information Ocean: Living with Anonymity, Digital Cash, and Distributed Databases. Journal of Law and Commerce 395(15): 492.
7. Gavison, Ruth. 1980. Privacy and the Limits of Law. Yale Law Journal 89(3): 421-71.
8. Harris Interactive. 2001. Overwhelming Public Support for Increasing Surveillance Powers and, Despite Concerns about Potential Abuse, Confidence that the Powers Will be Used Properly. October 3. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/ news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=370.
9. _. 2002. First Major Post-9/11 Privacy Survey Finds Consumers Demanding Companies Do More to Protect Privacy; Public Wants Company Privacy Policies to Be Independently Verified. February 20. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/ allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=429.
10. _. 2003. Most People are "Privacy Pragmatists" Who, While Concerned about Privacy, Will Sometimes Trade It Off for Other Benefits. March 19. http://www.harrisinteractive. com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=365.
11. Hart, H. L. A. 1949. The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49: 171-94.
12. Katsh, Ethan. 1995. Law in a Digital World. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Litman, Jessica. 2000. Information Privacy/Information Property. Stanford Law Review 52(5): 1283-1313.
14. Mill, John Stuart. 1956 [1859]. On Liberty. Edited by Currin V. Shields. New York: Macmillan.
15. Toner, Robin, and Janet Elder. 2001. A Nation Challenged: Attitudes; Public Is Wary but Supportive on Rights Curbs. New York Times, December 12. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res= F20617FF3E5BOC718DDDAB0994D9404482.
16. Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(1): 192-220.