Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool

Family Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 402-406

  Dobbie, Alison ^a   Rhodes, Martin ^b   Tysinger, James W ^c   Freeman, Joshua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;

COHORT STUDIES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FACULTY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2642526107     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal and Delphi processes. Glenview, III: Scott Foresman and Company, 1975.
2. Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative: evaluation cookbook. www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/kdi/cookbook/nominal_group_technique/Accessed November 10, 2003.
3. Hunter D, Jones J. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376-80.
4. Chapple M, Murphy R. The nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1996;21:147-59.
5. Lloyd-Jones D, Fowell S, Bligh JG. The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in medical undergraduate education. Med Educ 1999;33:8-13.
6. Powell AM, Hunt A, Irving A. Evaluation of courses by whole student cohorts: a case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1997;22(4):397-404.
7. Lancaster T, Hart R, Gardner S. Literature and medicine: evaluating a special study module using the nominal group technique. Med Educ 2002;36:1071-6.