The biomechanical relationship between incisor and condylar guidances in deep bite and normal cases

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 430-437

  Darendeliler, N ^a   Dincer M ^a   Soylu, R ^b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Condylar guidance; Deep bite; Incisor guidance

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BITE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; INCISOR; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT;

EID: 2642525912     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01264.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tallents RH, Catania J, Sommers E. Temporomandibular joint findings in pediatric population and young adults: a critical review. Angle Orthod. 1990;61:7-15.
2. Stack BC, Funt LA. Temporomandibular dysfunction in children. J Pedodont. 1977;1:240-247.
3. Owen AH. Orthodontic/orthopedic treatment of craniomandibular pain dysfunction. Part 2. Posterior condylar displacement. J Craniomandib Pract. 1984;2:344-349.
4. Ricketts RM. Clinical implications of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:416-439.
5. Roth RH. Temporomandibular pain-dysfunction and occlusal relationships. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:136-153.
6. Liebman M, Gazit C, Lilos P. Mandibular dysfunction in 10-18-year olds as related to morphologic occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 1985;2:209-214.
7. Mohlin B, Ingervall B, Thilander B. Relation between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction in Swedish men. Eur J Orthod. 1980;2:229-238.
8. Egermark-Eriksson I, Ingervall B. Anomalies of occlusion predisposing to occlusal interference in children. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:293-299.
9. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion, St Lois: Mosby; 1989:124-147.
10. Mc Collum BB, Stuart CE. A Research Report. South Pasadena, California: Scentific Press; 1955.
11. Takayama H, Hobo S. Kinematical and experimental analyses of the mandibular movement for clinical application. Int J Sys. 1984;2:229-304.
12. Kohno S, Nakano M. The measurement and development of anterior guidance. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:620-625.
13. Kantona TR. A mathematical model of mandibular protrusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:699-705.
14. Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. The influence of anterior guidance and condylar guidance on mandibular protrusive movement. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:303-309.
15. Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nagerl H, Klam B. The biomechanical relation between incisai and condylar guidance in man. J Biomech. 1988;12:997-1009.
16. Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nagerl H. Biomechanical aspects of stability of occlusion. In: Nanda R, Burstone CJ, eds Retention and Stability in Orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1993:171-202.
17. Lindaeur SJ, Sabol G, Isaacson RJ, Davidovitch M. Condylar movement and mandibular rotation during jaw opening. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:573-577.
18. Brekke CA. Jaw function. J Prosthet Dent. 1959;9:600-606.
19. Brotman DN. Hinge axis. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;10:436-440.
20. Brewka RE. Pantographic evaluation of cephalometric hinge axis. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:1-19.
21. Baragar FA, Osborn JW. A model relating patterns of human jaw movement to biomechanical constraints. J Biomech. 1984;17:757-767.
22. Jinbao W, Xiaoming X, Jingen S. Analysis of the open closing movement of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech. 1973;6:109-113.
23. Ricketts RM. Laminography in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 1953;46:620-648.
24. Thompson JR. Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:181-195.