Extended field-of-view sonography in Achilles tendon disease: A comparison with MR imaging;Panorama-ultraschall in der abklärung symptomatischer Achillessehnenerkrankungen: Ein vergleich zur MRT

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 704-708

  Reiter, Markus ^a,d   Ulreich, N ^b   Dirisamer, A ^c   Tscholakoff, D ^a   Bucek, R A ^a  

^a KRANKENANSTALT RUDOLFSTIFTUNG   (Austria)

^b University of Vienna   (Austria)

^c UNIV KLIN FÜR RADIODIAGNOSTIK   (Austria)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Achilles tendon disease; Extended field of view sonography; MRI; Tendinopathy

Indexed keywords

ACHILLES TENDON; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENDON DISEASE; THICKNESS;

ACHILLES TENDON; ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TENDINOPATHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 2642520554     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-812928     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anzilotti KJr, Schweitzer ME, Hecht P et al. Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical decision making. Radiology 1996; 201: 515-517
2. Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 613-615
3. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 176: 593-606
4. Aström M, Gentz CF, Nilsson P et al. Imaging in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 615-620
5. Premkumar A, Perry M, Dwyer AJ et al. Sonography and MR imaging of posterior tibial tendopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 223-232
6. Rockett MS, Waitches G, Sudakoff G et al. Use of ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance imaging for tendon abnormalities around the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 604-612
7. Ying M, Yeung E, Li B et al. Sonographic evaluation of the size of achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 637-42
8. Barberie JE, Wong AD, Cooperberg PL et al. Extended field-of-view sonography in musculoskeletal disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 751-757
9. Fornage BD, Atkinson EN, Nock LF et al. US with extended field of view: phantom-tested accuracy of distance measurements. Radiology 2000; 214: 579-584
10. Hara Y, Nakamura M, Tamaki N. A new sonographic technique for assessing carotid artery disease: extended-field-of-view imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 267-270
11. Henrich W, Fuchs I, Schmider A et al. Transvaginal and transabdominal extended field-of-view (EFOV) and power doppler EFOV sonography in gynecology: advantages and applications. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 1137-1144
12. Kroger K, Massalha K, Dobonici G et al. SieScape: a new sonographic dimension with fictive images. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 1125-1129
13. Lin EC, Middleton WD, Teefey SA. Extended field of view sonography in musculoskeletal imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 147-152
14. Sauerbrei EE. Extended field-of-view sonography: utility in clinical practice. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18; 335-341
15. Weng L, Tirumalai AP, Lowery CM et al. US extended-field-of-view imaging technology. Radiology 1997; 203: 877-880
16. Krombach GA, Truong S, Staatz G et al. Panorama ultrasonography of the abdominal wall for delineation of the anatomy and diagnosis of pathological findings. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 714-719
17. Staatz G, Hubner D, Wildberger JE et al. Panorama ultrasound of the spinal canal with determination of the level of the conus medullaris in newborn infants and infants. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 170: 564-567
18. Gibbon WW, Cooper RJ, Radcliffe GS. Distribution of sonographically detected tendon abnormalities in patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic Achilles tendinosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 61-66
19. Karjalainen PT, Kalevi S, Aronen HJ et al. MR Imaging of overuse injuries of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 251-260
20. Kvist M. Achilles tendon injuries in athletes. Sports Med 1994; 18: 173-201
21. Stiskal M, Neuhold A, Weinstabl R et al. MR tomography findings in lesions of the Achilles tendon. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1990; 153: 9-13
22. Haims AH, Schweitzer ME, Patel RS et al. MR imaging of the Achilles tendon: overlap of findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29: 640-645