No shades of gray: The binary discourse of George W. Bush and and echoing press

Journal of Communication

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 234-252

  Coe, Kevin ^a   Domke, David ^b   Graham, Erica S ^a   John, Sue Lockett ^a   Pickard, Victor W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDIA INDUSTRY;

EID: 2642513076     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/54.2.234     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Altman, K. E., & Nakayama, T. K. (1991). A difficult dialogue. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 116-128.
2. American Council of Trustees and Alumni. (2001, November). Defending civilization: How our universities are failing America and what can be done about it. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Billeaudeaux, A., Domke, D., Hutcheson, J., & Garland, P. (2003). Newspaper editorials follow the lead of Bush administration. Newspaper Research Journal, 24, 166-184.
4. Bloom, W. (1990). Personal identity, national identity and international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1945)
6. Bush exudes strength. (2001, September 21). San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe
7. Bush, G. W. (2001a, September 11). Address to the nation on the terrorist attacks. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://www.access.gpo.gov
8. Bush, G. W. (2001b, September 20). Address before a joint session of the Congress on the United States response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://www.access.gpo.gov
9. Bush, G. W. (2002a, January 29). Address before a joint session of the Congress on the state of the union. Retrieved January 9, 2003, from http://www.access.gpo.gov
10. Bush, G. W. (2002b, October 3). Remarks calling for Congressional action on terrorism insurance legislation. Retrieved May 8, 2003, from http://www.access.gpo.gov
11. Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 78-91.
13. Carr, A., & Zanetti, L. A. (1999). Metatheorizing the dialectic of self and other: The psychodynamics in work organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 324-345.
14. Carter, B., & Barringer, F. (2001, September 28). Speech and expression; in patriotic time, dissent is muted. New York Times, p. A1.
15. Cirksena, K., & Cuklanz, L. (1992). Male is to female as is to A guided tour of five feminist frameworks for communication studies. In L. F. Rakow (Ed.), Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication (pp. 18-44). New York: Routledge.
16. Dalby, S. (1990). Creating the second Cold War: The discourse of politics. London: Pinter.
17. Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92, 111-126.
18. Derrida, J. (1981). Positions, (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1972)
19. Domke, D., Watts, M., Shah, D., & Fan, D. (1999). The politics of conservative elites and the liberal media argument. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 35-58.
20. Edy, J. (1999). Journalistic uses of collective memory. Journal of Communication, 49(2), 71-85.
21. For ABC, a winning season, at least on paper. (2001, September 27). Washington Post, p. C7.
22. Getlin, T. (2003, April 11). War with Iraq/the media. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com
23. Glendon, M. A. (1991). Rights talk. The impoverishment of political discourse. New York: Free Press.
24. Huckin, T. N. (2002). Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness. Discourse & Society, 13, 347-372.
25. Hutcheson, J., Domke, D., Billeaudeaux, A., & Garland, P. (2004). U.S. national identity, political elites, and a patriotic press following September 11. Political Communication, 21, 27-51.
26. Ivie, R. (1980). Images of savagery in American's justifications for war. Communication Monographs, 47(4), 279-294.
27. Ivie, R. (1990). Metaphor and the rhetorical invention of Cold War "idealists." In B. K. Johnpoll (Series Ed.), Contributions to the study of mass media and communications: Vol. 19. Cold War rhetoric: Strategy, metaphor, and ideology (pp. 103-127). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
28. Jensen, E. (2003, April 2). War with Iraq; Arnett fuming at loss of NBC job. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com
29. King, A., & Anderson, F. (1971). Nixon, Agnew, and the "silent majority": A case study in the rhetoric of polarization. Western Speech, 35, 243-255.
30. Kuypers, J. (1997). Presidential crisis rhetoric and the press in the post-Cold War world. Westport, CT: Praeger.
31. Lewis, N. (2001, December 6). The Senate hearing; Ashcroft defends antiterror plan; says criticism may aid U.S. foes. New York Times, p. A1.
32. Lowry, B. (2003, January 1). Calendar; for cable networks, 2002 was a solid year. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 10, 2003, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com
33. Manheim, J. B. (1991). All of the people, all of the time: Strategic communication and American politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
34. Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy. In W. L. Bennett & D. L. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War (pp. 131-148). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58-67.
36. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. (Eds.). (1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Medhurst, M. J. (2000). Text and context in the 1952 presidential campaign: Eisenhower's "I shall go to Korea" speech. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 464-484.
38. Monroe, K. R., & Maher, K. H. (1995). Psychology and rational actor theory. Political Psychology, 16, 1-25.
39. Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order. New York: Vintage.
40. Peri, Y. (1999). The media and collective memory of Yitzhak Rabin's remembrance. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 106-124.
41. Pew Research Center. (2003, March 25). Public confidence in war effort falters but support for war holds steady. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://people-press.org/reports
42. Powlick, P. J. (1995). The sources of public opinion for American foreign policy officials. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 427-451.
43. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
44. Prokhovnik, R. (1999). Rational woman: A feminist critique of dichotomy. New York: Routledge.
45. Raum, R., & Measell, J. (1974). Wallace and his ways: A study of the rhetorical genre of polarization. Central States Speech Journal, 25, 28-35.
46. Rich, F. (2003, April 13). The spoils of war coverage. New York Times. Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://www.nytimes.com
47. Roberts, M., & McCombs, M. (1994). Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda. Political Communication, 11, 249-262.
48. Rutenberg, J. (2001, December 3). Fox portrays a war of good and evil, and many applaud. New York Times. Retrieved Dec. 3, 2001, from http://www.nytimes.com
49. Schaefer, T. M. (1997). Persuading the persuaders: Presidential speeches and editorial opinion. Political Communication, 14, 97-111.
50. Schuster, M. A., Stein, B. D., Jaycox, L. H., Collins, R. L., Marshall, G. N., Elliott, M. N., et al. (2001). A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1507-1512.
51. Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
52. Stuckey, M. E. (1995). Competing foreign policy visions: Rhetorical hybrids after the Cold War. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 214-227.
53. Vermeer, J. P. (2002). The view from the states: National politics in local newspaper editorials. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
54. Wanta, W. (1992). The influence of the president on the news media and public agendas. Mass Comm Review, 19, 14-21, 48.
55. Watts, M., Domke, D., Shah, D., & Fan, D. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns. Communication Research, 26, 144-175.
56. Weaver, D., & Nimley Elliott, S. (1985). Who sets the agenda for the media? A study of local agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 87-94.
57. Zaller, J. (1994a). Elite leadership of mass opinion: New evidence from the Gulf War. In W. L. Bennett & D. L. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm: The media, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War (pp. 186-209). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Zaller, J. (1994b). Strategic politicians, public opinion, and the Gulf crisis. In W. L. Bennett & D. L. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by Storm: The media, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War (pp. 250-274). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Zaller, J., & Chiu, D. (1996). Government's little helper: U.S. press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945-1991. Political Communication, 13, 385-405.