Hierarchical navigation: An exploration of yahoo! Directories

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 10-24

  Lee, Hur Li ^a   Olson, Hope A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044468459     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ainsbury, Bob. 2002. Cataloging's comeback: Classifying and organizing corporate documents. Online (May/April): 27-31.
2. Borgman, Christine, Sandra G. Hirsch, Virginia A. Walter, and Andrea L. Gallagher. 1995. Children's searching behavior on browsing and keyword catalogs: The Science Library Catalog Project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46: 663-84.
3. Callery, Anne. 1996. Yahoo! Cataloging the web. Untangling the Web. Available at: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/untangle/callery.html Accessed: October 6, 2004.
4. th IFLA Council and General Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, August 20-August 28, 1999. Available at: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/012-117e.htm Accessed October 8, 2004.
5. Cleverdon, Cyril W. 1962. Report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems. Cranfield, Eng.: College of Aeronautics.
6. Cleverdon, Cyril, and Michael Keen. 1966. Factors determining the performance of indexing systems. Vol. 2: test results. Cranfieldfield, Eng.: College of Aeronautics.
7. Cousins, Shirley Anne. 1992. In their own words: An examination of catalogue users' subject queries. Journal of information science 18: 329-41.
8. Cutter, Charles A. 1904. Rules for a dictionary catalog. 4th ed. Washington: Government Printing Office.
9. Dodd, David G. 1996. Grass-roots cataloging and classification: Food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists. Library resources & technical services 40: 275-86.
10. Drabenstott, Karen Markey, and Diane Vizine-Goetz. 1994. Using subject headings for online retrieval: Theory, practice, and potential. San Diego: Academic Press.
11. Ellis, David, and Ana Vasconcelos. 1999. Ranganathan and the net: Using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web. Aslib proceedings 51: 3-10.
12. Ellis, David, and Ana Vasconcelos. 2000. The relevance of facet analysis for World Wide Web subject organization and searching. Journal of internet cataloging 2n3/4: 97-114.
13. Hildreth, Charles R. 1995. Online catalog design models: Are we moving in the right direction? Part 5. Browsing and exploring: A new paradigm for IR/OPAC system design. Available at: http://www.ou.edu/faculty/H/Charles.R.Hildreth/ clr-five.html Accessed January 30, 2005.
14. Hudon, Michèle. 2003. Expanding audiences for education-related information and resources: Classificatory structures on the World Wide Web. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37n1/2: 81-96.
15. Koch, Traugott, Michael Day, et al. 1997. Specification for resource description methods. Part 3. The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery, http://www.ub.lu.se/desire/radar/reports/D3. 2.3/class_v.10.html January 30, 2005.
16. Larson, Ray R. 1991. The decline of subject searching: Long-term trends and patterns of index use in an online catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42: 197-215.
17. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2004. Classification of the web: Challenges and inquiries. Knowledge organization 31: 92-97.
18. Markey, Karen. 1986. Class number searching in an experimental online catalog. International classification no. 3: 142-50.
19. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology Online. 6th ed. 2003. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. McIlwaine, I.C. 2003. The UDC and the World Wide Web. In I.C. McIlwaine, ed. Subject retrieval in a networked environment; Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Dublin, OH 14-16 August 2001. München: K.G. Saur, pp. 170-76.
21. Micco, Mary. 1996. Subject authority control in the world of the internet. Part two. Libres 6n3. Available at: http://libres.curtin.edu.au/ libre6n3/micco_2.htm Accessed January 17, 2005.
22. Notess, Greg R. 1997. WEB sites: Directories. Database magazine 20n1: 61-64.
23. Pack, Thomas. 1995. WEB search engines: LOOKSMART, EBLAST, YAHOO! Inc., SNAP Database magazine 22n1: 51-54.
24. Said, Mirza Pahlevi, and Hiroyuki Kitagawa. 2005. Conveying taxonomy context for topic-focussed web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 56: 173-88.
25. Steinberg, Steve G. 1996. Seek and ye shall find (maybe). Wired, issue 4.05. Available at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.05/indexweb_pr.html Accessed January 20, 2005.
26. Sullivan, Danny. Search engine watch. Available at: http:// searchenginewatch.com/ Accessed January 30, 2005.
27. Sullivan, Danny. July 14, 2004. Nielsen NetRatings Search Engine Rating. http://searchenginewatch. com/reports/article.php/2156451 Accessed August 5, 2004.
28. Svenonius, Elaine. 1986. Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37: 331-40.
29. Van de Walt, Marthinus S. 1997. The role of classification in information retrieval on the Internet: some aspects of browsing lists in search engines. In Knowledge organization for information retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research. The Hague: International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID), pp. 32-35.
30. Van der Walt, Martin. 1998. The structure of classification schemes used in Internet search engines. In W. Mustafa el Hadi, J. Maniez and S.A. Pollitt, eds. Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Fifth International ISKO Conference, 25-29 August 1998, Lille, France. Würzburg, Germany: Ergon Verlag, pp. 379-87.
31. Warner, Julian. 2000. Can classification yield an evaluative principle for information retrieval? In R. Marcella and Arthur Maltby, eds. The future of classification. Aldershot, England: Gower, pp. 33-41.
32. Weinberg, Bella Hass. 1999. Improved internet access: Guidance from research on indexing and classification. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 25n2:. 26-29.
33. Wheatley, Alan. 2000. Subject trees on the internet: A new role for bibliographic classification? Journal of Internet cataloging 2n3/4: 115-41.
34. White, Martin. 2001. Architecture, search, integration: Classification is the common denominator. EContent (September): 54-55.
35. Williamson, Nancy J. 1997. Knowledge structures and the Internet. In Knowledge organization for information retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research. The Hague: International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID), pp. 23-27.
36. Yee, Martha M. 1998. Guidelines for OPAC displays. Prepared for the IFLA Task Force on Guidelines for OPAC Displays. Available at http://www.ifla.org/ ifla/VII/s 13/guide/opac-d.pdf Accessed March 29, 2005.