Programs, plans, and practices in schools with reputations for ESL student success

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 481-499

  Kouritzin, Sandra G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044462717     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.60.4.481     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ashworth, M. (2000). Effective teachers, effective schools: Second language teaching in Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Toronto: Pippin.
2. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Burnaby, B. (1998). ESL policy in Canada and the United States: Basis for comparison. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 243-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Carney, T.F. (1972). Content analysis: A technique for systematic inference from communications. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
5. Collier, V.P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617-641.
6. Derwing, T.M., DeCorby, E., Ichikawa, J., & Jamieson, K. (1999). Some factors that affect the success of ESL high school students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 532-547.
7. ESL Provincial Specialist Association [ESL PSA], British Columbia. (2001, February). ESL services in rural/low-incidence districts [Report of ad hoc committee].
8. Eddy, C. (1999, May). The forces who shape us. Paper presented at the Teachers of English as a Second Language in Canada Conference, Banff, AB.
9. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
10. Kanno, Y., & Applebaum, S.D. (1995). ESL students speak up: Their stories of how we are doing. TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 32-49.
11. Kidd, R., & Marquardson, B. (1994). Sourcebook for integrating ESL and content instruction using the Foresee Approach (rev. ed.). Winnipeg: Manitoba Education and Training.
12. Kouritzin, S., & P. Mathews. (2002). Policies affecting ESL instruction in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 22, 1-16. Retrieved January 31, 2004, from http://www.umanitoba.ca/ publications/cjeap/issuesOnline.html
13. McGivern, L., & Eddy, C. (1999). Language policy: Vancouver's multicultural mosaic. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 29-33.
14. Miele, P. (1982). Suggestopedia: Easier learning the natural way. Sandy Spring, MD: Utopia Unlimited.
15. Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Neuman, W.L. (1991). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Newman, J.M. (1987). Learning to teach by uncovering our assumptions. Language Arts, 64, 727-737.
18. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.
19. Ramirez, J.D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16, 1-62.
20. Roessingh, H. (1999). Adjunct support for high school ESL learners in mainstream English classes: Ensuring success. TESL Canada Journal, 17(1), 72-86.
21. Roessingh, H., & Field, D. (2000). Time, timing, timetabling: Critical elements of successful graduation of high school ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 17-31.
22. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. TESL Canada (n.d.) Institutional standards draft. Retrieved December 9, 2003, from http://www.tesl.ca/inststandards.html
24. Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V.P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. Retrieved December 9, 2003, from http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/llaa/1.1pdfs/1.1_01es.pdf
25. Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English in schools: Identity, social relations, and classroom practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
26. Watt, D., & Roessingh, H. (2001). The dynamics of ESL dropout: Plus ça change⋯The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 203-222.