Comparison of manual and automated ELISA methods for serum ferritin analysis

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 196-198

  Rohner, Fabian ^a   Zeder, Christophe ^a   Zimmermann, Michael B ^a   Hurrell, Richard F ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Automated; Ferritin; Immunoassay; Manual; Serum

Indexed keywords

FERRITIN;

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FERRITIN BLOOD LEVEL; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA; IRON STORAGE; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOROCCO; PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; AUTOMATION; CHILD; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FERRITINS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 26044450002     PISSN: 08878013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20077     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund, et al. Iron deficiency anemia: assessment, prevention, and control. WHO/NHD/01.3. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
2. Cook JD. Defining optimal body iron. Proc Nutr Soc 1999; 58:489-495.
3. Mast AE, Blinder MA, Gronowski AM, Chumley C, Scott MG. Clinical utility of the soluble transferrin receptor and comparison with serum ferritin in several populations. Clin Chem 1998;44: 45-51.
4. Zemelka S, Biesalski HK. Measurement of ferritin levels: comparison of a commercial IRMA to an in-house ELISA method. J Immunoassay Immunochem 2001;22:371-384.
5. Hess SY, Zimmermann MB, Adou P, Torresani T, Hurrell RF. Treatment of iron deficiency in goitrous children improves the efficacy of iodized salt in Cote d'Ivoire. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75:743-748.
6. Zimmermann MB, Zeder C, Chaouki N, Saad A, Torresani T, Hurrell RF. Dual fortification of salt with iodine and microencapsulated iron: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in Moroccan schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77: 425-432.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986:307-310.