Integrated coastal reserve planning: Making the land-sea connection

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 429-436

  Stoms, David M ^a   Davis, Frank W ^a   Andelman, Sandy J ^b   Carr, Mark H ^c   Gaines, Steven D ^a   Halpern, Benjamin S ^b,c   Hoenicke, Rainer ^d   Leibowitz, Scott G ^e   Leydecker, Al ^a   Madin, Elizabeth M P ^a   Tallis, Heather ^f   Warner, Robert R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; LAND USE; NATURE RESERVE; SITE SELECTION; WATERSHED;

EID: 26044444419     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0429:ICRPMT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Airamé S, Dugan JE, Lafferty KD, et al. 2003.. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecol Appl 13: S170-84.
2. Beck MW. 2003. The sea around: conservation planning in marine regions. In: Groves CR (Ed). Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner's guide to planning for biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, et al. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51: 633-41.
4. Beck MW and Odaya M. 2001. Ecoregional planning in marine environments: identifying priority sites for conservation in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Conserv 11: 235-42.
5. Belfiore S. 2003. The growth of integrated coastal management and the role of indicators in integrated coastal management: introduction to the special issue. Ocean Coast Manage 46: 225-34.
6. Carr MH, Neigel JE, Estes JA, et al. 2003. Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13: S90-S107.
7. Cho L. 2005. Marine protected areas: a tool for integrated coastal management in Belize. Ocean Coast Manage. In press.
8. Church RL, Scaparra MP, and Middleton RS. 2004. Identifying critical infrastructure: the median and covering facility interdiction problems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94: 491-502.
9. Cicin-Sain B and Knecht RW. 1998. Integrated coastal and ocean management: concepts and practices. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Costanza R, Voinov A, Boumans R, et al. 2002. Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River watershed, Maryland. Ecol Monogr 72: 203-31.
11. Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Rouget M, and Lombard AT. 2003. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112: 191-216.
12. Croll DA, Maron JL, Estes JA, et al. 2005. Introduced predators transform subarctic islands from grassland to tundra. Science 307: 1959-61.
13. Davis FW, Stoms DM, and Andelman S. 1999. Systematic reserve selection in the USA: an example from the Columbia Plateau ecoregion. Parks 9: 31-41.
14. Don C. 2002. Could the San Juan Islands National Wildlife Refuge serve to protect marine areas? Building on existing institutions and legal authorities to create marine protected areas. Coast Manage 30: 421-26.
15. Forman RTT and Deblinger RD. 2000. The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conserv Biol 14: 36-46.
16. Halpern BS and Warner RR. 2003. Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 270: 1871-78.
17. Hyman JB and Leibowitz SG. 2000. A general framework for prioritizing land units for ecological protection and restoration. Environ Manage 25: 23-35.
18. Leibowitz SG, Loehle C, Li B-L, and Preston EM. 2000. Modeling landscape functions and effects: a network approach. Ecol Model 132: 77-94.
19. Margules CR and Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-53.
20. Nixon S. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication - a definition, social causes and future concerns. Ophelia 41: 199-219.
21. Nixon SW. 2003. Replacing the Nile: are anthropogenic nutrients providing the fertility once brought to the Mediterranean by a great river? Ambio 32: 30-39.
22. Noss RF, Carroll C, Vance-Borland K, and Wuerthner G. 2002. A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Conserv Biol 16: 895-908.
23. Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Leslie H, and Warner RR. 2003. New wave: high-tech tools to help marine reserve research. Front Ecol Environ 1: 73-79.
24. Pew Oceans Commission. 2003. America's living oceans: charting a course for sea change. A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: Pew Oceans Commission.
25. Reiners WA and Driese KL. 2001. The propagation of ecological influences through heterogeneous environmental space. BioScience 51: 939-50.
26. Reynolds KM, Jensen M, Andreasen J, and Goodman I. 2000. Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Comput Electron Agr 27: 315-34.
27. Roberts CM, Branch G, Bustamante RH, et al. 2003. Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and developing reserve networks. Ecol Appl 13: S215-28.
28. Rothley KD. 1999. Designing bioreserve networks to satisfy multiple, conflicting demands. Ecol Appl 9: 741-50.
29. Sala E, Aburto-Oropeza O, Paredes G, et al. 2002. A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science 298: 1991-93.
30. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, et al. 2003. Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 1: 31-37.
31. Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ, et al. 2004. Muddy waters: elevating sediment input to coastal and estuarine habitats. Front Ecol Environ 2: 299-306.
32. US Commission on Ocean Policy. 2004. An ocean blueprint for the 21st Century. Final report. Washington, DC: US Commission on Ocean Policy.
33. Van Noordwijk M, Poulsen JG, and Ericksen PJ. 2004. Quantifying off-site effects of land use change: filters, flows and fallacies. Agr Ecos Environ 104: 19-34.
34. Wallington TJ, Hobbs RJ, and Moore SA. 2005. Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: a review of the salient issues, www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art15/. Viewed 17 June 2005
35. Williams JC, ReVelle CS, and Levin SA. 2004. Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Front Ecol Environ 2: 98-105.