The appearance of security zones in US cities after 9/11

Property Management

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 244-256

  Hollander, Justin B ^a   Whitfield, Crofton ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US General Services Administration   (United States)

Author keywords

Cities; Community planning; State security; Terrorism; United States of America; Urban regions

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044438258     PISSN: 02637472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02637470510618398     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Atlas, R. (1991), “The other sided of CPTED”, Security Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 63-67.
2. Carmona, M., De Magalhaes, C. and Edwards, M. (2002), “Stakeholder views on value and urban design”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 145-170.
3. Clay, G. (1973), Close-up: How to Read the American City, Praeger Publishers, New York, NY.
4. Cozens, P.M. (2002), “Sustainable urban development and crime prevention through environmental deesign for the British city. Towards an effective urban environmentalism for the 21st century”, Cities, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 129-137.
5. Crowe, T.D. (2000), Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA.
6. Czarnecki, J.E. (2002), “Symposium speakers insist on freedom without fortresses”, Architectural Record, Vol. 190 No. 1, pp. 26-29.
7. Dovey, K. (2001), “Memory, democracy and urban space: Bangkok's ‘path to democracy’”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 265-282.
8. Du Plessis, C. (1999), “The links between crime prevention and sustainable development”, Open House International, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 33-40.
9. Garde, A.M. (1999), “Marginal spaces in the urban landscape: regulated margins or incidental open spaces?”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 200-210.
10. GSA (1997), Security Criteria and Standards, General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
11. GSA (1999a), Balancing Security and Openness: A Thematic Summary of a Symposium on Security and the Design of Public Buildings, General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
12. GSA (1999b), Urban Design Guidelines for Physical Perimeter Entrance Security: An Overlay to the Master Plan for the Federal Triangle, General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
13. Goldsteen, J. (1989), What Fills an Office Building? It's Neighborhood or its Design, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
14. Hart, S. (2002), “In the aftermath of September 11th, the urban landscape appears vulnerable and random”, Architectural Record, Vol. 190 No. 3, pp. 135-141.
15. Harris, L.K. (2003), “Fight over historic site plans is revived”, The Philadelphia Inquirer, available at: www.philly.com, (accessed September 21).
16. Hough, D. and Krantz, C. (1983), “Can ‘good’ architecture meet the market test?”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 37-49.
17. Independence Mall Business and Residents Coaltion (2004), available at: www.freeindependencehall.com (accessed August 26).
18. I-Team (2004), WCPO News, 9 May, Washington Park, Cincinnati, OH, available at: www.cincinnati.com (accessed May 7).
19. Jacobs, J. (1961), The Life and Death of Great American Cities, Random House, New York, NY.
20. Kapper, T. and Chenoweth, R. (2000), “Landscape architecture and societal values: evidence from the literature”, Landscape Journal, Vol. 19 Nos 1, pp. 149-155.
21. Kennedy, D.B. (1993), “Architectural concerns regarding security and premises liability”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 105-129.
22. Marcus, C.C. and Francis, C. (Eds.) (1997), People Place: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
23. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (1997), Infill Development Strategies for shaping Livable Neighborhoods, Report No. 38, Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington, Seattle, WA.
24. National Capital Planning Commission (2001), Designing for Security in the Nation's Capital, October report, National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, DC.
25. National Capital Planning Commission (2002), The National Capital Urban Design and Security plan, October report, National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, DC.
26. Newman, O. (1973), Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design, Institute for Community Design Analysis, Inc., Great Neck, NY.
27. Project for Public Spaces, Inc. (2000), How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces, Project for Public Spaces, Inc., New York, NY.
28. Security Design Coalition (2002), Designing for a Secure Future Symposium, Security Design Coalition, New York, NY, 26-28 September.
29. Sloan, G. (2002), “Sites under signs of siege”, USA Today, September 6.
30. Speckhardt, L. and Dowdell, J. (2002), “Creating safety”, Landscape Architecture, Vol. 92 No. 9, pp. 64-73.
31. Vendall, K. and Lane, J. (1989), “The economics of architecture and urban design: some preliminary findings”, Journal of American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 235-260.
32. Whyte, W. (1980), The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
33. Inam, A. (2002), “Meaningful urban design: teleological/catalytic/relevant”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 7 No. 10, pp. 35-58.