An insurer's perspective on error and loss in pathology

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 129, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1234-1236

  Troxel, David B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Doctors Company   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATYPICAL FIBROXANTHOMA; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER; CONFERENCE PAPER; DERMATOFIBROMA; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DYSPLASTIC NEVUS; FIBROXANTHOMA; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; JUVENILE MELANOMA; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL ERROR; MELANOMA; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATHOLOGY; REIMBURSEMENT; SPINDLE CELL CARCINOMA; SPINDLE CELL SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; SURGERY;

DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; INSURANCE, LIABILITY; MALPRACTICE; MELANOMA; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL; SKIN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 26044435409     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Safrin R, Bark C. Surgical pathology sign-out: routine review of every case by a second pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:1190-1192.
2. Ramsey AD, Gallagher PJ. Local audit of surgical pathology: 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:476-482.
3. Lind A, Bewtra C, Healy J, Sims K. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;104:560-566.
4. Wakely S, Baxendine-Jones J, Gallagher P, Mullee M, Pickering R. Aberrant diagnoses by individual surgical pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:77-82.
5. Renshaw A, Young M, Jiroutek M. How many cases need to be reviewed to compare performance in surgical pathology? Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119:388-391.
6. Renshaw A, Norberto-Cartagena N, Granter S, Gould E. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119:797-800.
7. Tomaszewski J, Bear H, Connally J, et al. Consensus conference on second opinions in diagnostic anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114:329-335.
8. Renshaw A. Measuring and reporting errors in surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:338-341.
9. Troxel D. Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 7: random errors. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9:305-308.
10. Troxel D. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma: findings of a risk management panel study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1278-1283.
11. Troxel D. Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 4: melanoma. Int J Surg Pathol 2001;9:61-63.
12. Troxel D. Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 3: breast biopsies. Int J Surg Pathol. 2000;8:335-337.
13. Troxel D. Diagnostic pitfalls in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 2: breast fine needle aspiration. Int J Surg Pathol. 2000; 8:223-227.
14. Troxel D. Medicolegal issues in surgical pathology. In: Weidner N, Cote R, Suster S, Weiss L, eds. Modern Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2003:139-148.
15. Troxel D. Diagnostic pitfalls in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 5: lymphoma, prostate biopsy, and frozen section. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9:133-136.
16. Troxel D. Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology uncovered by a review of malpractice claims, part 6: urinary bladder and branchial cleft cyst. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9:227-229.